Re: [PATCH] drm: document expectations for GETFB2 handles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:25:38 +0000
Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thursday, February 16th, 2023 at 10:11, Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Btw. does this also mean that if you use GETFB2 to get handle A, you
> > export that as dmabuf and import in the same open device instance, you
> > again get handle A?  
> 
> I haven't tested it, but I believe that is correct.
> 
> > IOW, you should never ever export a dmabuf of what you got with
> > GETFB2. If one did, one might import it oneself via GBM, breaking all
> > reference counting. But you also cannot "just leak" the handle A,
> > because if GBM happens to run on a different DRM device opened
> > instance, GBM would get a different handle to own.
> > 
> > That's... err. How is a compositor supposed to do transition animation
> > from an old FB to its own thing? I guess mmap + glTexImage2D equivalent
> > to make a copy of the old FB so one can use it as a texture?  
> 
> I think the compositor can export the handle as DMA-BUF, then close the
> handle immediately. Then go about its business as usual.

Ah! Of course, I didn't think of that.


Thanks,
pq

Attachment: pgpJBTqA1H4KE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux