Hi Isabella, On Friday, 10 February 2023 17:55:34 CET Isabella Basso wrote: > Hi, Janusz, > > > Am 2023-02-10 um 11:56 AM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > Hi Isabella, > > > > On Monday, 19 September 2022 22:55:44 CET Isabella Basso wrote: > >> Hi, Janusz, > >> > >>> Am 09/09/2022 um 12:18 PM schrieb Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>> > >>> ... > >>> > >>> Anyway, related to my comment about naming that function a parser, I think the > >>> best approach would be for that parser to return a generic set of results from > >>> kunit execution, then we could feed that data into an IGT specific handler > >>> that would convert them to IGT results (SUCCESS, FAIL, or SKIP) as if returned > >>> by a set of IGT dynamic subtests. > >> > >> That sounds like a good idea to me, I might take some extra time before v3 to > >> do that, though. > > > > Were you able to make any progress? Do you need any help? > > I’ve already handled most common cases but I still have to address Chehab’s comments — specifically in what concerns crashes. I’ve been doing most of the development by myself as GSoC has ended so I’m taking my time on this. > > My most up-to-date work is available at [1], so if you have any suggestions as to what might be done I’d love to hear them before sending out v3 to the mailing list. > > [1] - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/isinyaaa/igt-gpu-tools/-/merge_requests/1 Thanks for pointing me to that merge request, it's great to know there is some progress. I've just had a look and I can see you are now working on some comments from Maria and Tales. I've requested to be notified on new posts to that merge request so I hope to review your next update when available. As soon as you resolve issues and feel comfortable with sharing your work, please submit your changes to the igt-dev list to give them a try on our CI system. Thanks, Janusz > > Cheers, > -- > Isabella Basso > > > Thanks, > > Janusz > > > > > >
