On 2/7/2023 4:31 AM, Maíra Canal wrote:
Hi Stanislaw,
On 2/1/23 12:20, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
Hi
I was about to send debugfs support for ivpu and noticed that there
are current changes that deprecate drm_devel->debugfs_init callback.
Further I looked at this commit [1], that stated we should not
use drm_minor for debugfs and sysfs. What is quite contrary to
what drm accel framework did in the first place.
So my question is how we should use debugfs/sysfs in accel?
Use it with old fashioned minor-centric way or change
the framework somehow ?
As we are trying to replace drm_debugfs_create_files() [1], it would
be nice to see the accel debugfs support use the new debugfs API. This
would mean using the debugfs_list from the drm_device, deprecating
the debugfs_init callback, and adding the a similar code snippet to
accel_debugfs_init:
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &dev->debugfs_list, list) {
debugfs_create_file(entry->file.name, 0444,
minor->debugfs_root, entry, &drm_debugfs_entry_fops);
list_del(&entry->list);
Maybe Daniel has some more thoughts on this matter, but I guess it
would be better to drop the use of the old-fashioned minor-centric
implementation in accel.
[1]
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/tree/Documentation/gpu/todo.rst#n511
Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal
Thank you for the details Maira. It helps to explain what the todo is
suggesting. Is there an example of a driver/drm_device that uses
debugfs_list which you can easily point to?
-Jeff
[1]
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-misc/commit/?id=99845faae7099cd704ebf67514c1157c26960a26
Regards
Stanislaw
