Hi Guilherme, Thanks for redoing to a v3. This patch is: Reviewed-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx> Regards, Luben On 2023-02-02 08:48, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote: > Currently amdgpu calls drm_sched_fini() from the fence driver sw fini > routine - such function is expected to be called only after the > respective init function - drm_sched_init() - was executed successfully. > > Happens that we faced a driver probe failure in the Steam Deck > recently, and the function drm_sched_fini() was called even without > its counter-part had been previously called, causing the following oops: > > amdgpu: probe of 0000:04:00.0 failed with error -110 > BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000090 > PGD 0 P4D 0 > Oops: 0002 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI > CPU: 0 PID: 609 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 6.2.0-rc3-gpiccoli #338 > Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0113 11/04/2022 > RIP: 0010:drm_sched_fini+0x84/0xa0 [gpu_sched] > [...] > Call Trace: > <TASK> > amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini+0xc8/0xd0 [amdgpu] > amdgpu_device_fini_sw+0x2b/0x3b0 [amdgpu] > amdgpu_driver_release_kms+0x16/0x30 [amdgpu] > devm_drm_dev_init_release+0x49/0x70 > [...] > > To prevent that, check if the drm_sched was properly initialized for a > given ring before calling its fini counter-part. > > Notice ideally we'd use sched.ready for that; such field is set as the latest > thing on drm_sched_init(). But amdgpu seems to "override" the meaning of such > field - in the above oops for example, it was a GFX ring causing the crash, and > the sched.ready field was set to true in the ring init routine, regardless of > the state of the DRM scheduler. Hence, we ended-up using sched.ops as per > Christian's suggestion [0], and also removed the no_scheduler check [1]. > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/984ee981-2906-0eaf-ccec-9f80975cb136@xxxxxxx/ > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/amd-gfx/cd0e2994-f85f-d837-609f-7056d5fb7231@xxxxxxx/ > > Fixes: 067f44c8b459 ("drm/amdgpu: avoid over-handle of fence driver fini in s3 test (v2)") > Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Guchun Chen <guchun.chen@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c | 8 +++++++- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c > index 00444203220d..faff4a3f96e6 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_fence.c > @@ -618,7 +618,13 @@ void amdgpu_fence_driver_sw_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > if (!ring || !ring->fence_drv.initialized) > continue; > > - if (!ring->no_scheduler) > + /* > + * Notice we check for sched.ops since there's some > + * override on the meaning of sched.ready by amdgpu. > + * The natural check would be sched.ready, which is > + * set as drm_sched_init() finishes... > + */ > + if (ring->sched.ops) > drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched); > > for (j = 0; j <= ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask; ++j) -- Regards, Luben
