On 02/02/2023 08:58, Christian König wrote: > [...] >> + if (!ring->no_scheduler && ring->sched.ops) >> drm_sched_fini(&ring->sched); > > I think we should drop the check for no_scheduler here and just call > drm_sched_fini() when the scheduler instance was initialized before. > > Background is that I've found a couple of places where we potentially > set no_scheduler to false after the scheduler was already initialized. > > This is then probably leading to a memory leak or worth. > > Regards, > Christian. Thanks Christian, nice finding! And thanks for the reviews Guchun / Luben =) I just submitted a V3 [0], but didn't add the review tags from Guchun / Luben, since the patch changed. Cheers, Guilherme [0] https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20230202134856.1382169-1-gpiccoli@xxxxxxxxxx/
