Now that CONFIG_DEPT_AGGRESSIVE_TIMEOUT_WAIT was introduced, apply the
consideration to swait, assuming an input 'ret' in ___swait_event()
macro is used as a timeout value.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@xxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/swait.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swait.h b/include/linux/swait.h
index 0284821..def1e47 100644
--- a/include/linux/swait.h
+++ b/include/linux/swait.h
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static inline bool swq_has_sleeper(struct swait_queue_head *wq)
struct swait_queue __wait; \
long __ret = ret; \
\
- sdt_might_sleep_start(NULL); \
+ sdt_might_sleep_start_timeout(NULL, __ret); \
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&__wait.task_list); \
for (;;) { \
long __int = prepare_to_swait_event(&wq, &__wait, state);\
--
1.9.1
