Hello, On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 12:44:30AM +0800, Jianhua Lu wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 05:16:13PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > I don't want to squash the changes to the ktz8866 driver into the patch > > that modifies struct i2c_driver, as this needlessly clutters the commit, > > if it's that what you wanted. (There are more than 1000 i2c drivers and > > the others are not converted in a single lockstep, too.) > > Do't squash this patch, I'd like you send a series patch instead of > a single patch. This series was already sent before. However that happend based on a tree that didn't contain the ktz8866 backlight driver, so this patch came later (and I didn't resend the whole series for the two drivers that were added since then :-). See https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. for the original post. Letting this patch go in via the i2c tree together with the commit changing i2c_driver is fine for me, it won't be the only one. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
