Re: [PATCH 5/9] drm/display/dp_mst: Fix the payload VCPI check in drm_dp_mst_dump_topology()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 09:42:39PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 01:48:48PM +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> > Fix an off-by-one error in the VCPI check in drm_dp_mst_dump_topology().
> > 
> > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > index 81cc0c3b1e000..619f616d69e20 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> > @@ -4770,7 +4770,7 @@ void drm_dp_mst_dump_topology(struct seq_file *m,
> >  		list_for_each_entry(payload, &state->payloads, next) {
> >  			char name[14];
> >  
> > -			if (payload->vcpi != i || payload->delete)
> > +			if (payload->vcpi != i + 1 || payload->delete)
> 
> Why does this code even do that funny nested double loop?

The payload list is not ordered by VCPIs I think, but the printout wants
to list them in VCPI order.

> 
> >  				continue;
> >  
> >  			fetch_monitor_name(mgr, payload->port, name, sizeof(name));
> > -- 
> > 2.37.1
> 
> -- 
> Ville Syrjälä
> Intel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux