On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 11:51:04AM -0600, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > On 1/20/2023 11:46, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 04:50:44PM +0800, Wayne Lin wrote: > > > This reverts commit 4d07b0bc403403438d9cf88450506240c5faf92f. > > > > > > [Why] > > > Changes cause regression on amdgpu mst. > > > E.g. > > > In fill_dc_mst_payload_table_from_drm(), amdgpu expects to add/remove payload > > > one by one and call fill_dc_mst_payload_table_from_drm() to update the HW > > > maintained payload table. But previous change tries to go through all the > > > payloads in mst_state and update amdpug hw maintained table in once everytime > > > driver only tries to add/remove a specific payload stream only. The newly > > > design idea conflicts with the implementation in amdgpu nowadays. > > > > > > [How] > > > Revert this patch first. After addressing all regression problems caused by > > > this previous patch, will add it back and adjust it. > > > > Has there been any progress on this revert, or on fixing the underlying > > problem ? > > > > Thanks, > > Guenter > > Hi Guenter, > > Wayne is OOO for CNY, but let me update you. > > Harry has sent out this series which is a collection of proper fixes. > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/113125/ > > Once that's reviewed and accepted, 4 of them are applicable for 6.1. Any hint on when those will be reviewed and accepted? patchwork doesn't show any activity on them, or at least I can't figure it out... thanks, greg k-h
