On 1/25/23 15:04, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 7:23 PM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/25/23 07:54, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:54 AM Jagan Teki <jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:42 AM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/24/23 22:01, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 2:18 AM Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/23/23 16:12, Jagan Teki wrote:
Enable and disable of te_gpio's are Exynos platform specific
irq handling, so add the exynos based irq operations and hook
them for exynos plat_data.
If this is just an optional generic GPIO IRQ, why not keep it in the
core code ? TE (tearing enable?) should be available on MX8M too.
So far the discussion (since from initial versions) with Marek
Szyprowski, seems to be available in Exynos. So, I keep it separate
from the DSIM core.
Isn't TE a generic GPIO IRQ ? If so, it is available also on i.MX8M .
I will check this.
In order to use TE_GPIO we need te handler implementation, right now
Exynos CRTC DRM drivers have implementation for this. That is the main
reason to keep the TE_GPIO handling in exynos, maybe if we handle that
generically then it is a viable option to move TE_GPIO to the DSIM
core.
I think you can do this exactly the same way exynos does it -- check
whether te_handler() callback is implemented by the glue code (the one
you already have for various exynos and imx8mm/imx8mm SoCs) and if so,
call it. If it is not implemented, do not call anything in the TE IRQ
handler.
I need to understand how i.MX8MM handles this on TE IRQ in the DSIM
host side, Can I do this in future patch set as it might involve
bindings changes as well if it's part of DSIM?
Why not leave an empty te_handler implementation on MX8M for now ?
You can fill that implementation in future patchset, but the generic
part of the code would be in place .
