Am 11.01.23 um 14:17 schrieb Matthew Auld:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 11:43, Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:We have checks for this in the individual drivers move callback, but it's probably better to generally forbit that on a higher level. Also stops exporting ttm_resource_compat() since that's not necessary any more after removing the extra checks in vmwgfx. Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 4 ---- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 3 --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c | 4 ---- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c | 1 - drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 19 ++----------------- 6 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c index 068c2d8495fd..677cd7d91687 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c @@ -466,11 +466,7 @@ static int amdgpu_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict, return r; } - /* Can't move a pinned BO */ abo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(bo); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(abo->tbo.pin_count > 0)) - return -EINVAL; - adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(bo->bdev); if (!old_mem || (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM && diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c index 288eebc70a67..c2ec91cc845d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c @@ -1015,9 +1015,6 @@ nouveau_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict, if (ret) goto out_ntfy; - if (nvbo->bo.pin_count) - NV_WARN(drm, "Moving pinned object %p!\n", nvbo); - if (drm->client.device.info.family < NV_DEVICE_INFO_V0_TESLA) { ret = nouveau_bo_vm_bind(bo, new_reg, &new_tile); if (ret) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c index 1e8e287e113c..67075c85f847 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_ttm.c @@ -211,11 +211,7 @@ static int radeon_bo_move(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, bool evict, if (r) return r; - /* Can't move a pinned BO */ rbo = container_of(bo, struct radeon_bo, tbo); - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rbo->tbo.pin_count > 0)) - return -EINVAL; - rdev = radeon_get_rdev(bo->bdev); if (old_mem->mem_type == TTM_PL_SYSTEM && bo->ttm == NULL) { ttm_bo_move_null(bo, new_mem); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index 326a3d13a829..9baccb2f6e99 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -894,14 +894,18 @@ int ttm_bo_validate(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, if (!placement->num_placement && !placement->num_busy_placement) return ttm_bo_pipeline_gutting(bo); - /* - * Check whether we need to move buffer. - */ - if (!bo->resource || !ttm_resource_compat(bo->resource, placement)) { - ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, ctx); - if (ret) - return ret; - } + /* Check whether we need to move buffer. */ + if (bo->resource && ttm_resource_compat(bo->resource, placement)) + return 0;Note this now skips the tt create below (intentional?). I think i915 needed that, since it creates a dummy system resource initially for all objects, and then relies on ZERO_ALLOC being set for certain objects to know if the memory needs to be cleared or not when later doing the dummy -> vram. Thoughts?
That's unproblematic. On initial allocation bo->resource is NULL so we never branch out here.
Christian.
+ + /* Moving of pinned BOs is forbidden */ + if (bo->pin_count) + return -EINVAL; + + ret = ttm_bo_move_buffer(bo, placement, ctx); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* * We might need to add a TTM. */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c index b8a826a24fb2..7333f7a87a2f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_resource.c @@ -361,7 +361,6 @@ bool ttm_resource_compat(struct ttm_resource *res, return false; } -EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_resource_compat); void ttm_resource_set_bo(struct ttm_resource *res, struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c index 321c551784a1..dbcef460c452 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c @@ -87,12 +87,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_placement(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto err; - if (buf->base.pin_count > 0) - ret = ttm_resource_compat(bo->resource, placement) - ? 0 : -EINVAL; - else - ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, placement, &ctx); - + ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, placement, &ctx); if (!ret) vmw_bo_pin_reserved(buf, true); @@ -128,12 +123,6 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_vram_or_gmr(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, if (unlikely(ret != 0)) goto err; - if (buf->base.pin_count > 0) { - ret = ttm_resource_compat(bo->resource, &vmw_vram_gmr_placement) - ? 0 : -EINVAL; - goto out_unreserve; - } - ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &vmw_vram_gmr_placement, &ctx); if (likely(ret == 0) || ret == -ERESTARTSYS) goto out_unreserve; @@ -218,11 +207,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_start_of_vram(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, (void) ttm_bo_validate(bo, &vmw_sys_placement, &ctx); } - if (buf->base.pin_count > 0) - ret = ttm_resource_compat(bo->resource, &placement) - ? 0 : -EINVAL; - else - ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &placement, &ctx); + ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &placement, &ctx); /* For some reason we didn't end up at the start of vram */ WARN_ON(ret == 0 && bo->resource->start != 0); -- 2.34.1
