On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 5:07 AM Sakari Ailus
<sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Prashant,
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 02:31:45PM -0800, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > HI Sakari,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 5:32 AM Sakari Ailus
> > <sakari.ailus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Pin-yen,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 12:20:56PM +0800, Pin-yen Lin wrote:
> > > > From: Prashant Malani <pmalani@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > + /*
> > > > + * Some drivers may register devices for endpoints. Check
> > > > + * the remote-endpoints for matches in addition to the remote
> > > > + * port parent.
> > > > + */
> > > > + node = fwnode_graph_get_remote_endpoint(ep);
> > > > + if (fwnode_device_is_available(node)) {
> > > > + ret = match(node, con_id, data);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + if (matches)
> > > > + matches[count] = ret;
> > > > + count++;
> > > > + }
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Aren't you missing fwnode_handle-put(node) here??
> >
> > It shouldn't be necessary. We aren't break-ing/continue-ing here,
> > and fwnode_handle_put(node) is called latter in the loop [1][2]
>
> It is, but node is overwritten just below this chunk --- before
> fwnode_handle_put() is called on it.
Ack. Thanks for pointing that out. My bad!
Pin-yen, please make this update when you send out a v11.
BR,
-Prashant
