On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 at 13:51, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On some SoCs (hello SM6375) vdds-supply is not wired to any smd-rpm > or rpmh regulator, but instead powered by the VDD_MX/mx.lvl line, > which is voted for in the DSI ctrl node. I think we should have an explicit `if compatible then required: vdds-supply' clause. WDYT? > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > index 9c9184f94c44..8e9031bbde73 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml > @@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ required: > - compatible > - reg > - reg-names > - - vdds-supply > > unevaluatedProperties: false > > -- > 2.39.0 > -- With best wishes Dmitry
