On 1/13/2023 1:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 21:47, Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 12/7/2022 4:08 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
According to the vendor DT, sm6115 has UBWC 1.0, not 2.0.
Can you please point me to which file you are referring to?
The internal docs I have are still showing 2.0.
If I understood correctly sm6115 = bengal, thus:
https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/msm-extra/devicetree/+/refs/heads/android-msm-bramble-4.19-android11-qpr1/qcom/bengal-sde.dtsi#103
Ok, so the cause of discrepancy was that the overall recommendation
across sub-systems was to use UWBC 1.0. Thats why the DTSI has 1.0.
Hence, this change LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
index 2219c1bd59a9..4401f945b966 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_mdss.c
@@ -532,7 +532,7 @@ static const struct msm_mdss_data sm8150_data = {
};
static const struct msm_mdss_data sm6115_data = {
- .ubwc_version = UBWC_2_0,
+ .ubwc_version = UBWC_1_0,
.ubwc_swizzle = 7,
.ubwc_static = 0x11f,
};
