On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 07:25:08PM +0530, Deepak R Varma wrote:
Hello,
May I please request a review and feedback on this patch proposal?
Thank you,
./drv
> A call to platform_get_irq() already prints an error on failure within
> its own implementation. So printing another error based on its return
> value in the caller is redundant and should be removed. The clean up
> also makes if condition block braces unnecessary. Remove that as well.
>
> Issue identified using platform_get_irq.cocci coccicheck script.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak R Varma <drv@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/sprd/sprd_dpu.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/sprd/sprd_dpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/sprd/sprd_dpu.c
> index 88f4259680f1..db0bcea1d9f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sprd/sprd_dpu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sprd/sprd_dpu.c
> @@ -803,10 +803,8 @@ static int sprd_dpu_context_init(struct sprd_dpu *dpu,
> }
>
> ctx->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> - if (ctx->irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get dpu irq\n");
> + if (ctx->irq < 0)
> return ctx->irq;
> - }
>
> /* disable and clear interrupts before register dpu IRQ. */
> writel(0x00, ctx->base + REG_DPU_INT_EN);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
