Re: [PATCH v2] drm/msm/dp: do not complete dp_aux_cmd_fifo_tx() if irq is not for aux transfer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 12/15/2022 1:15 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On 15/12/2022 22:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-12-15 10:46:42)
On 15/12/2022 20:32, Kuogee Hsieh wrote:
       if (!aux->cmd_busy)
               return;

       if (aux->native)
-             dp_aux_native_handler(aux, isr);
+             ret = dp_aux_native_handler(aux, isr);
       else
-             dp_aux_i2c_handler(aux, isr);
+             ret = dp_aux_i2c_handler(aux, isr);

-     complete(&aux->comp);
+     if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
+             complete(&aux->comp);

Can you just move the complete() into the individual handling functions?
Then you won't have to return the error code from dp_aux_*_handler() at
all. You can check `isr' in that function and call complete if there was
any error.

I'd prefer we apply my patch and pass the irqreturn_t variable to the
caller of this function so spurious irqs are shutdown. Should I send it
as a proper patch?

I'm for handling the spurious IRQs in a proper way. However I believe that it's not related to the issue Kuogee is trying to fix.

Thus I think we should have two separate patches: one fixing the EDID corruption issue (for which the proper fix is !isr check, IIUC) and the irqreturn_t. And for the irqreturn_t it might be beneficial to move complete() call to the dp_aux_foo_handler(). Or might be not. That would depend on the patch itself.

Ack.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux