On Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:04:14 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Compared to the txt description this adds clocks and clock-names to > match reality. > > Note that fsl,imx-lcdc was picked as the new name as this is the actual > hardware's name. There will be a new binding implementing the saner drm > concept that is supposed to supersede this legacy fb binding > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes since v1, sent with Message-Id: > - mention clock stuff being added (Philipp) > - dropped some quotes (Rob) > - fix specification of compatible > (I kept claiming though that imx21 isn't compatible to imx1. While > that might be true, I don't have an i.MX1 to check the details and > currently the imx*.dtsi don't claim that compatibility.) > > I tried to implement the suggestion by Rob to formalize the display > binding. But I learned that this doesn't change how the display property > is formalized in the fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml (which is just a phandle without > means to specify that it should point to a node which fulfills a certain > binding.) > > Best regards > Uwe > > .../bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-fb.txt | 57 ---------- > .../bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml | 102 ++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-fb.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/imx/fsl,imx-lcdc.yaml > Applied, thanks!
