Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: A collection of typo and documentation fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:43 AM Christian König
<ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Am 24.11.22 um 10:05 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 08:03:09AM +0100, Christian König wrote:
> >> Am 23.11.22 um 20:35 schrieb T.J. Mercier:
> >>> I've been collecting these typo fixes for a while and it feels like
> >>> time to send them in.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: T.J. Mercier <tjmercier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
> > Will you also push this? I think tj doesn't have commit rights yet, and I
> > somehow can't see the patch locally (I guess it's stuck in moderation).
>
> I was just about to complain that this doesn't apply cleanly to
> drm-misc-next.
>
> Trivial problem, one of the typos was just removed by Dimitry a few
> weeks ago.
>
> I've fixed that up locally and pushed the result, but nevertheless
> please make sure that DMA-buf patches are based on the drm branches.
>
I'm sorry, this was on top of a random spot in Linus's 6.1-rc5.
(84368d882b96 Merge tag 'soc-fixes-6.1-3') I'm not sure why I did
that, but I suspect it was after a fresh git pull. I have too many
repos.

Thanks all for the reviews.

> Thanks,
> Christian.
>
> > -Daniel
> >
> >>> ---
> >>>    drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 14 +++++++-------
> >>>    include/linux/dma-buf.h   |  6 +++---
> >>>    2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> index dd0f83ee505b..614ccd208af4 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> >>> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_unmap_attachment, DMA_BUF);
> >>>     *
> >>>     * @dmabuf:      [in]    buffer which is moving
> >>>     *
> >>> - * Informs all attachmenst that they need to destroy and recreated all their
> >>> + * Informs all attachments that they need to destroy and recreate all their
> >>>     * mappings.
> >>>     */
> >>>    void dma_buf_move_notify(struct dma_buf *dmabuf)
> >>> @@ -1159,11 +1159,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
> >>>    /**
> >>>     * DOC: cpu access
> >>>     *
> >>> - * There are mutliple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
> >>> + * There are multiple reasons for supporting CPU access to a dma buffer object:
> >>>     *
> >>>     * - Fallback operations in the kernel, for example when a device is connected
> >>>     *   over USB and the kernel needs to shuffle the data around first before
> >>> - *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by braketing any transactions
> >>> + *   sending it away. Cache coherency is handled by bracketing any transactions
> >>>     *   with calls to dma_buf_begin_cpu_access() and dma_buf_end_cpu_access()
> >>>     *   access.
> >>>     *
> >>> @@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_move_notify, DMA_BUF);
> >>>     *   replace ION buffers mmap support was needed.
> >>>     *
> >>>     *   There is no special interfaces, userspace simply calls mmap on the dma-buf
> >>> - *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to braket the actual access,
> >>> + *   fd. But like for CPU access there's a need to bracket the actual access,
> >>>     *   which is handled by the ioctl (DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC). Note that
> >>>     *   DMA_BUF_IOCTL_SYNC can fail with -EAGAIN or -EINTR, in which case it must
> >>>     *   be restarted.
> >>> @@ -1264,10 +1264,10 @@ static int __dma_buf_begin_cpu_access(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> >>>     * preparations. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
> >>>     * specified access direction.
> >>>     * @dmabuf:      [in]    buffer to prepare cpu access for.
> >>> - * @direction:     [in]    length of range for cpu access.
> >>> + * @direction:     [in]    direction of access.
> >>>     *
> >>>     * After the cpu access is complete the caller should call
> >>> - * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is braketed by both calls is
> >>> + * dma_buf_end_cpu_access(). Only when cpu access is bracketed by both calls is
> >>>     * it guaranteed to be coherent with other DMA access.
> >>>     *
> >>>     * This function will also wait for any DMA transactions tracked through
> >>> @@ -1307,7 +1307,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dma_buf_begin_cpu_access, DMA_BUF);
> >>>     * actions. Coherency is only guaranteed in the specified range for the
> >>>     * specified access direction.
> >>>     * @dmabuf:      [in]    buffer to complete cpu access for.
> >>> - * @direction:     [in]    length of range for cpu access.
> >>> + * @direction:     [in]    direction of access.
> >>>     *
> >>>     * This terminates CPU access started with dma_buf_begin_cpu_access().
> >>>     *
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/dma-buf.h b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>> index 71731796c8c3..1d61a4f6db35 100644
> >>> --- a/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>> +++ b/include/linux/dma-buf.h
> >>> @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
> >>>      * @lock:
> >>>      *
> >>>      * Used internally to serialize list manipulation, attach/detach and
> >>> -    * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseeded by
> >>> +    * vmap/unmap. Note that in many cases this is superseded by
> >>>      * dma_resv_lock() on @resv.
> >>>      */
> >>>     struct mutex lock;
> >>> @@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
> >>>      */
> >>>     const char *name;
> >>> -   /** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name acces for read access. */
> >>> +   /** @name_lock: Spinlock to protect name access for read access. */
> >>>     spinlock_t name_lock;
> >>>     /**
> >>> @@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ struct dma_buf {
> >>>      *   anything the userspace API considers write access.
> >>>      *
> >>>      * - Drivers may just always add a write fence, since that only
> >>> -    *   causes unecessarily synchronization, but no correctness issues.
> >>> +    *   causes unnecessary synchronization, but no correctness issues.
> >>>      *
> >>>      * - Some drivers only expose a synchronous userspace API with no
> >>>      *   pipelining across drivers. These do not set any fences for their
>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux