Re: Build regressions/improvements in v6.1-rc6

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2022-11-22 at 08:55 -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> > 
> >    + /kisskb/src/arch/um/include/asm/processor-generic.h: error: called object is not a function or function pointer:  => 94:18
> >    + /kisskb/src/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../amdkfd/kfd_topology.c: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]:  => 1934:1
> > 
> > um-x86_64/um-all{mod,yes}config (in kfd_cpumask_to_apic_id())
> 
> Presumably cpu_data is not defined on um-x86_64?  Does it even make
> sense to build drivers on um-x86_64?

Drivers in general yes ;-)

This driver, probably not.

But the issue is that a lot of drivers "depends on X86_64" or such,
where only "X86" is the arch symbol. You could add "X86 && X86_64" to
really build on x86 64-bit only.

I didn't check this driver, but this has mostly popped up since UM got
PCI support some time ago (which I added.)

johannes






[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux