On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 08:51:58PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote: > Our side, Yu He, Lixiao Yang has done below tests on Intel platform with > the above kernel, results are: > > 1) GVT-g test suit passed, Intel iGFx passthrough passed. > > 2) NIC passthrough test with different guest memory (1G/4G), passed. > > 3) Booting two different QEMUs in the same time but one QEMU opens > legacy /dev/vfio/vfio and another opens /dev/iommu. Tests passed. > > 4) Tried below Kconfig combinations, results are expected. > > VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=y -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=y, IOMMUFD=n -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=y -- test pass > VFIO_CONTAINER=n, IOMMUFD=y , IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER=n -- no > /dev/vfio/vfio, so test fail, expected > > 5) Tested devices from multi-device group. Assign such devices to the same > VM, pass; assign them to different VMs, fail; assign them to a VM with Intel > virtual VT-d, fail; Results are expected. > > Meanwhile, I also tested the branch in development branch for nesting, > the basic functionality looks good. > > Tested-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx> Great thanks! In future I also recommend running tests with the CONFIG_IOMMUFD_TEST turned on, it enables a bunch more fast path assertions that might catch something interesting Jason
