On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 9:16 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 09:06:54PM +0100, Karol Herbst wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 8:21 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 11:13:17AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > On Thu, 10 Nov 2022, coverity-bot <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > > > > > This is an experimental semi-automated report about issues detected by > > > > > Coverity from a scan of next-20221110 as part of the linux-next scan project: > > > > > https://scan.coverity.com/projects/linux-next-weekly-scan > > > > > > > > > > You're getting this email because you were associated with the identified > > > > > lines of code (noted below) that were touched by commits: > > > > > > > > > > Mon Aug 31 19:10:08 2020 -0400 > > > > > a0922278f83e ("drm/nouveau/kms/nv50-: Refactor and cleanup DP HPD handling") > > > > > > > > Hi Kees, this looks like a good idea, but maybe double check the Cc list > > > > generation? I was Cc'd on four mails today that I thought were > > > > irrelevant to me. > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Heh, I was recently asked to _expand_ the CC list. :) > > > > > > For these last pass of reports, I added a get_maintainers.pl run to the > > > identified commit. In this instance, the commit touched: > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv04/disp.c | 6 + > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c | 192 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c | 14 --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c | 2 > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.h | 2 > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dp.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_encoder.h | 33 +++++++- > > > 7 files changed, 244 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-) > > > > > > And the get_maintainers.pl rationale was: > > > > > > Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS,commit_signer:1/1=100%,commit_signer:6/16=38%,authored:4/16=25%,added_lines:23/124=19%,removed_lines:36/152=24%) > > > Karol Herbst <kherbst@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS,commit_signer:2/1=100%) > > > Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS,commit_signer:9/16=56%,authored:6/16=38%,added_lines:92/124=74%,removed_lines:107/152=70%) > > > David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > > > Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) > > > Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:1/1=100%,authored:1/1=100%,added_lines:2/2=100%,removed_lines:2/2=100%) > > > "Nathan E. Egge" <unlord@xxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:1/1=100%) > > > Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:6/16=38%) > > > Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxxx> (commit_signer:5/16=31%) > > > Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> (commit_signer:4/16=25%,authored:4/16=25%) > > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS) > > > nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS) > > > > > > > I'd say it's good enough to message supporters and the mailing lists > > for at least Nouveau code, maybe even all drm drivers. > > i.e. leave out the commit_signer hits? > yes. > > Not sure what to do about actual maintainers, but I doubt Dave and > > Daniel want to be CCed on every Coverity report here either. > > I updated the CC logic based on this feedback: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hardening/87h6zgfub4.fsf@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > So maybe just mailing lists? > That should be good enough, but maybe the DRM subsystem is big enough so it's reasonable to add special rules. For Nouveau either way is fine. > -- > Kees Cook >
