On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 02:55:17PM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Call fb_dirty directly from drm_fb_helper_deferred_io() to avoid the > latency of running the damage worker. > > The deferred-I/O helper drm_fb_helper_deferred_io() runs in a worker > thread at regular intervals as part of writing to mmaped framebuffer > memory. It used to schedule the fbdev damage worker to flush the > framebuffer. Changing this to flushing the framebuffer directly avoids > the latency introduced by the damage worker. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > index be8ecb5e50b56..ebc44ed1bf4a2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_fb_helper.c > @@ -644,10 +644,14 @@ static void drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip(struct fb_info *info, off_t off, > void drm_fb_helper_deferred_io(struct fb_info *info, struct list_head *pagereflist) > { > struct drm_fb_helper *helper = info->par; > + struct drm_device *dev = helper->dev; > unsigned long start, end, min_off, max_off; > struct fb_deferred_io_pageref *pageref; > struct drm_rect damage_area; > > + if (drm_WARN_ON(dev, !helper->funcs->fb_dirty)) > + return; > + > min_off = ULONG_MAX; > max_off = 0; > list_for_each_entry(pageref, pagereflist, list) { > @@ -656,22 +660,26 @@ void drm_fb_helper_deferred_io(struct fb_info *info, struct list_head *pagerefli > min_off = min(min_off, start); > max_off = max(max_off, end); > } > - if (min_off >= max_off) > - return; > > - if (helper->funcs->fb_dirty) { The replacement of this if() with the drm_WARN_ON above looks like it's a leftover from 93e81e38e197 ("drm/fb_helper: Minimize damage-helper overhead"), which hasn't pulled the ->fb_dirty check all the way out fully. It confused me quite a bit until I stitched the story together. I think splitting this out would be best, but minimally explain this in the commit message. Either way Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > - /* > - * As we can only track pages, we might reach beyond the end > - * of the screen and account for non-existing scanlines. Hence, > - * keep the covered memory area within the screen buffer. > - */ > - max_off = min(max_off, info->screen_size); > + /* > + * As we can only track pages, we might reach beyond the end > + * of the screen and account for non-existing scanlines. Hence, > + * keep the covered memory area within the screen buffer. > + */ > + max_off = min(max_off, info->screen_size); > > + if (min_off < max_off) { > drm_fb_helper_memory_range_to_clip(info, min_off, max_off - min_off, &damage_area); > - drm_fb_helper_damage(helper, damage_area.x1, damage_area.y1, > - drm_rect_width(&damage_area), > - drm_rect_height(&damage_area)); > + drm_fb_helper_add_damage_clip(helper, damage_area.x1, damage_area.y1, > + drm_rect_width(&damage_area), > + drm_rect_height(&damage_area)); > } > + > + /* > + * Flushes all dirty pages from mmap's pageref list and the > + * areas that have been written by struct fb_ops callbacks. > + */ > + drm_fb_helper_fb_dirty(helper); > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_fb_helper_deferred_io); > > -- > 2.38.0 > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch