Re: [PATCH v7 15/23] drm/modes: Introduce more named modes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Den 07.11.2022 15.16, skrev Maxime Ripard:
> Now that we can easily extend the named modes list, let's add a few more
> analog TV modes that were used in the wild, and some unit tests to make
> sure it works as intended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - Renamed the tests to follow DRM test naming convention
> 
> Changes in v5:
> - Switched to KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c                     |  2 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> index 49441cabdd9d..17c5b6108103 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c
> @@ -2272,7 +2272,9 @@ struct drm_named_mode {
>  
>  static const struct drm_named_mode drm_named_modes[] = {
>  	NAMED_MODE("NTSC", 13500, 720, 480, DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE, DRM_MODE_TV_MODE_NTSC),
> +	NAMED_MODE("NTSC-J", 13500, 720, 480, DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE, DRM_MODE_TV_MODE_NTSC_J),
>  	NAMED_MODE("PAL", 13500, 720, 576, DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE, DRM_MODE_TV_MODE_PAL),
> +	NAMED_MODE("PAL-M", 13500, 720, 480, DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE, DRM_MODE_TV_MODE_PAL_M),
>  };
>  
>  static int drm_mode_parse_cmdline_named_mode(const char *name,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> index fdfe9e20702e..b3820d25beca 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_client_modeset_test.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,32 @@ static void drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_ntsc(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, drm_mode_equal(drm_mode_analog_ntsc_480i(drm), mode));
>  }
>  
> +static void drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_ntsc_j(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> +	struct drm_device *drm = priv->drm;
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector;
> +	struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmdline_mode = &connector->cmdline_mode;
> +	struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +	const char *cmdline = "NTSC-J";
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test,
> +			  drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(cmdline,
> +								    connector,
> +								    cmdline_mode));
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> +	ret = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(connector, 1920, 1080);
> +	mutex_unlock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	mode = drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode(connector);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, mode);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, drm_mode_equal(drm_mode_analog_ntsc_480i(drm), mode));
> +}
> +
>  static void drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_pal(struct kunit *test)
>  {
>  	struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> @@ -159,10 +185,38 @@ static void drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_pal(struct kunit *test)
>  	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, drm_mode_equal(drm_mode_analog_pal_576i(drm), mode));
>  }
>  
> +static void drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_pal_m(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> +	struct drm_client_modeset_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
> +	struct drm_device *drm = priv->drm;
> +	struct drm_connector *connector = &priv->connector;
> +	struct drm_cmdline_mode *cmdline_mode = &connector->cmdline_mode;
> +	struct drm_display_mode *mode;
> +	const char *cmdline = "PAL-M";
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_TRUE(test,
> +			  drm_mode_parse_command_line_for_connector(cmdline,
> +								    connector,
> +								    cmdline_mode));
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> +	ret = drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes(connector, 1920, 1080);
> +	mutex_unlock(&drm->mode_config.mutex);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_GT(test, ret, 0);
> +
> +	mode = drm_connector_pick_cmdline_mode(connector);
> +	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, mode);
> +
> +	KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, drm_mode_equal(drm_mode_analog_ntsc_480i(drm), mode));
> +}
> +

There are 4 named mode tests that are almost identical, should probably
use KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM like in the parser tests.

This patchset has been going on for a long time now so it can be fixed
later if you don't want to do it now:

Reviewed-by: Noralf Trønnes <noralf@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>  static struct kunit_case drm_test_pick_cmdline_tests[] = {
>  	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_pick_cmdline_res_1920_1080_60),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_ntsc),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_ntsc_j),
>  	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_pal),
> +	KUNIT_CASE(drm_test_pick_cmdline_named_pal_m),
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux