On 08/11/2022 12:01, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Tue, 08 Nov 2022, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Convert some usages of legacy DRM logging macros into versions which tell
us on which device have the events occurred.
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
.../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 23 ++++++----
.../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 13 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_ggtt_fencing.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt_irq.c | 8 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 6 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds.c | 43 +++++++++++--------
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_workarounds_types.h | 4 ++
.../gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_workarounds.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_getparam.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 12 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 14 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_query.c | 12 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c | 16 ++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 21 +++++----
19 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
index 01402f3c58f6..7f2831efc798 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ set_proto_ctx_engines_bond(struct i915_user_extension __user *base, void *data)
}
if (intel_engine_uses_guc(master)) {
- DRM_DEBUG("bonding extension not supported with GuC submission");
+ drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "bonding extension not supported with GuC submission");
return -ENODEV;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index 1160723c9d2d..1eb7b66191b2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -2148,7 +2148,8 @@ static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
return err;
}
-static int i915_gem_check_execbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *exec)
+static int i915_gem_check_execbuffer(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
+ struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *exec)
{
if (exec->flags & __I915_EXEC_ILLEGAL_FLAGS)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -2161,7 +2162,7 @@ static int i915_gem_check_execbuffer(struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 *exec)
}
if (exec->DR4 == 0xffffffff) {
- DRM_DEBUG("UXA submitting garbage DR4, fixing up\n");
+ drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "UXA submitting garbage DR4, fixing up\n");
exec->DR4 = 0;
}
if (exec->DR1 || exec->DR4)
@@ -2744,6 +2745,7 @@ add_timeline_fence_array(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
const struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer_ext_timeline_fences *timeline_fences)
{
struct drm_i915_gem_exec_fence __user *user_fences;
+ struct drm_device *drm = &eb->i915->drm;
Elsewhere we've been pretty strict about not adding struct drm_device as
a local variable, just struct drm_i915_private *i915. We don't want to
have both, and in general it's more likely i915 is needed than
drm_device, if not now then in the future. Even if it means having to
use &i915->drm here.
Yeah it smelled bad while I was typing it.. will change.
Regards,
Tvrtko
