On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 04:51:39PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: > I tried executing the following code in a dummy driver I wrote: You don't need to write a dummy driver; you can write test-cases entirely in userspace. Just add them to lib/test_xarray.c and then make -C tools/testing/radix-tree/ > static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(xa_dummy); > void check_xa(void *pdev) > { > void *entry; > int ret, index; > > ret = xa_alloc(&xa_dummy, &index, NULL, XA_LIMIT(0, 63), GFP_NOWAIT); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > entry = xa_cmpxchg(&xa_dummy, index, NULL, pdev, GFP_KERNEL); > if (xa_is_err(entry)) > return; > > xa_lock(&xa_dummy); > xa_dev = xa_load(&xa_dummy, index); > xa_unlock(&xa_dummy); > } > > And to my surprise xa_dev is always NULL, when it should be pdev. > I believe that because we first allocate the entry with NULL, it is > considered a "zero" entry in the XA. > And when we replace it, this attribute doesn't change so when we do > xa_load, the xa code thinks the entry is a "zero" entry and returns > NULL. There's no "attribute" to mark a zero entry. It's just a zero entry. The problem is that you're cmpxchg'ing against NULL, and it's not NULL, it's the ZERO entry. This is even documented in the test code: /* cmpxchg sees a reserved entry as ZERO */ XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != 0); XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 12345678, XA_ZERO_ENTRY, xa_mk_value(12345678), GFP_NOWAIT) != NULL); I'm not quite sure why you're using xa_cmpxchg() here anyway; if you allocated it, it's yours and you can just xa_store() to it.