Hi On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 09:10:36AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Mon, Nov 07, 2022 at 03:01:08PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > I don't agree with your statement that it should be "a layer over top of DRM". > > Anything on top of DRM is a device driver. > > Accel is not a device driver, it is a new type of drm minor / drm driver. > > Yeah, I still think this is not the right way, you are getting almost > nothing from DRM and making everything more complicated in the > process. > > > The only alternative imo to that is to abandon the idea of reusing > > drm, and just make an independant accel core code. > > Not quite really, layer it properly and librarize parts of DRM into > things accel can re-use so they are not intimately tied to the DRM > struct device notion. What do you mean by "struct device notion" ? struct drm_devce ? Regards Stanislaw
