On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 07:33:17PM +0200, Christian König wrote: > Am 28.10.22 um 18:36 schrieb Kees Cook: > > > All that said, converting away from them can be tricky, and I think such > > conversions need to explicitly show how they were checked for binary > > differences[2]. > > Oh, that's a great idea! Yes, if this can be guaranteed then the change is > obviously perfectly ok. > > > > > Paulo, can you please check for deltas and report your findings in the > > commit log? Note that add struct_size() use in the same patch may result > > in binary differences, so for more complex cases, you may want to split > > the 1-element conversion from the struct_size() conversions. > > > > -Kees Noted. I will reporting my findings on commit logs from now onwards. Given that I split the if-ternary to avoid checking "fake_edid_record->ucFakeEDIDLength" twice then (for the current patch), yes, there will be changes to *.o|ko files. Knowing that Christian would feel more confident with no binary changes at this point, I will send a different patch aiming solely on the replacement of 1-elem array without incurring binary changes. -- Paulo A.
