On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 01:04:53PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Call sysfb_disable() from aperture_remove_conflicting_pci_devices()
> before removing PCI devices. Without, simpledrm can still bind to
> simple-framebuffer devices after the hardware driver has taken over
> the hardware. Both drivers interfere with each other and results are
> undefined.
>
> Reported modesetting errors are shown below.
>
> ---- snap ----
> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 13-.... } 7 jiffies s: 165 root: 0x2000/.
> rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
> Task dump for CPU 13:
> task:X state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 4242 ppid: 4228 flags:0x00000008
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? commit_tail+0xd7/0x130
> ? drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x126/0x150
> ? drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe0
> ? drm_plane_get_damage_clips.cold+0x1c/0x1c
> ? drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb+0x19e/0x280
> ? drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0x10f/0x1e0
> ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
> ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x150
> ? drm_ioctl+0x246/0x3f0
> ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
> ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
> ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0
> ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
> </TASK>
> ...
> rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 13-.... } 30 jiffies s: 169 root: 0x2000/.
> rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
> Task dump for CPU 13:
> task:X state:R running task stack: 0 pid: 4242 ppid: 4228 flags:0x0000400e
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? memcpy_toio+0x76/0xc0
> ? memcpy_toio+0x1b/0xc0
> ? drm_fb_memcpy_toio+0x76/0xb0
> ? drm_fb_blit_toio+0x75/0x2b0
> ? simpledrm_simple_display_pipe_update+0x132/0x150
> ? drm_atomic_helper_commit_planes+0xb6/0x230
> ? drm_atomic_helper_commit_tail+0x44/0x80
> ? commit_tail+0xd7/0x130
> ? drm_atomic_helper_commit+0x126/0x150
> ? drm_atomic_commit+0xa4/0xe0
> ? drm_plane_get_damage_clips.cold+0x1c/0x1c
> ? drm_atomic_helper_dirtyfb+0x19e/0x280
> ? drm_mode_dirtyfb_ioctl+0x10f/0x1e0
> ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
> ? drm_ioctl_kernel+0xc4/0x150
> ? drm_ioctl+0x246/0x3f0
> ? drm_mode_getfb2_ioctl+0x2d0/0x2d0
> ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x91/0xd0
> ? do_syscall_64+0x60/0xd0
> ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0xb5
> </TASK>
>
> The problem was added by commit 5e0137612430 ("video/aperture: Disable
> and unregister sysfb devices via aperture helpers") to v6.0.3 and does
> not exist in the mainline branch.
Why isn't this a problem in Linus's tree? What commits there cause this
to not be an issue and why can't we just take them instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
