On 2022-10-06 22:48, Deming Wang wrote:
Using vma_lookup() verifies the start address is contained in the found
vma. This results in easier to read the code.
Thank you for the patches. This and your other patch look good to me.
However, you missed one use of find_vma in svm_range_is_valid. Is that
an oversight or is there a reason why we need to use find_vma there?
If you're going to respin it, you may also squash the two patches into one.
Thanks,
Felix
Signed-off-by: Deming Wang <wangdeming@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
index 64fdf63093a0..cabcc2ca3c23 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
@@ -1586,8 +1586,8 @@ static int svm_range_validate_and_map(struct mm_struct *mm,
unsigned long npages;
bool readonly;
- vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
- if (!vma || addr < vma->vm_start) {
+ vma = vma_lookup(mm, addr);
+ if (!vma) {
r = -EFAULT;
goto unreserve_out;
}
@@ -2542,8 +2542,8 @@ svm_range_get_range_boundaries(struct kfd_process *p, int64_t addr,
struct interval_tree_node *node;
unsigned long start_limit, end_limit;
- vma = find_vma(p->mm, addr << PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!vma || (addr << PAGE_SHIFT) < vma->vm_start) {
+ vma = vma_lookup(p->mm, addr << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (!vma) {
pr_debug("VMA does not exist in address [0x%llx]\n", addr);
return -EFAULT;
}
@@ -2871,8 +2871,8 @@ svm_range_restore_pages(struct amdgpu_device *adev, unsigned int pasid,
/* __do_munmap removed VMA, return success as we are handling stale
* retry fault.
*/
- vma = find_vma(mm, addr << PAGE_SHIFT);
- if (!vma || (addr << PAGE_SHIFT) < vma->vm_start) {
+ vma = vma_lookup(mm, addr << PAGE_SHIFT);
+ if (!vma) {
pr_debug("address 0x%llx VMA is removed\n", addr);
r = 0;
goto out_unlock_range;
