On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 10:27 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Am 12.10.22 um 09:44 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 9:40 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>> Am 12.10.22 um 09:17 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2022, at 8:46 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does qemu mark the device has having a particular endianess then, or
>>>> does it switch the layout of the framebuffer to match what the CPU
>>>> does?
>>>
>>> The latter. On neither architecture does qemu expose this flag. The
>>> default endianess corresponds to the host.
>>
>> "host" as in the machine that qemu runs on, or the machine that is
>> being emulated? I suppose it would be broken either way, but in the
>> latter case, we could get away with detecting that the machine is
>> running under qemu.
>
> Sorry, my mistake. I meant "guest": the endianess of the framebuffer
> corresponds to the endianess of the emulated machine. Given that many
> graphics cards support LE and BE modes, I assume that this behavior
> mimics real-hardware systems.
Not really: While the hardware may be able to switch between
the modes, something has to actively set some hardware registers up
that way, but the offb/ofdrm driver has no interface for interacting
with that register, and the bootloader or firmware code that knows
about the register has no information about what kernel it will
eventually run. This is a bit architecture dependent, as e.g. on
MIPS, a bi-endian hardware platform has to run a bootloader with the
same endianness as the kernel, but on arm and powerpc the bootloader
is usually fixed and the kernel switches to its configured endianness
in the first few instructions after it gets entered.
Arnd
