On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 11:03:15AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 10:35 PM Dmitry Torokhov > <dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Dmitry, could you fix this? Just patch away in gpiolib-of.c. > > > > Sure, I'll add a few quirks. I wonder what is the best way to merge > > this? I can create a bunch of IBs to be pulled, or I can send quirks to > > you/Bartosz and once they land send the patches to drivers... > > When I did it I was sufficiently convinced that I was the only one patching > the quirks in gpiolib-of.c that merge window so I just included it as > a hunk in the driver patch. If there will be some more patches to that > file I guess some separate patch(es) for gpiolib-of.c is needed, maybe > an immutable branch for those if it becomes a lot. Are renames likely to be a common quirk on the road to libgpiod conversion? I admit I sort of expected it to be common enough that there would be one rename quirk in the code supported by an alphabetized string table. Such a table would certainly still provoke troublesome merges but ones that are trivially resolved. Daniel.
