Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: Add 4k@30 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-10-05 12:10, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 12:51:57PM +0200, Dan Johansen wrote:

Den 05.10.2022 kl. 12.06 skrev Sascha Hauer:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2022 at 10:39:27AM +0200, Dan Johansen wrote:
Den 28.09.2022 kl. 10.37 skrev Sascha Hauer:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 07:53:54PM +0200, Dan Johansen wrote:
Den 26.09.2022 kl. 12.30 skrev Michael Riesch:
Hi Sascha,

On 9/26/22 10:04, Sascha Hauer wrote:
This series adds support for 4k@30 to the rockchip HDMI controller. This
has been tested on a rk3568 rock3a board. It should be possible to add
4k@60 support the same way, but it doesn't work for me, so let's add
4k@30 as a first step.
														     Sascha

Changes since v1:
- Allow non standard clock rates only on Synopsys phy as suggested by
      Robin Murphy

Sascha Hauer (2):
      drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: relax mode_valid hook
      drm/rockchip: dw_hdmi: Add support for 4k@30 resolution

     drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/dw_hdmi-rockchip.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++-----
     1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Thanks for the v2! On a RK3568 EVB1 with a HP 27f 4k monitor

Tested-by: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sadly this still doesn't give my display out on my 2k monitor. Not even just
1080p picture like the old current implementation does.
By "like the old current implementation" you mean that this patchset
introduces a regression for you?
Yes. What currently in the kernel at least shows as 1080p on my 2K monitor,
while this patchset turns off the screen.
Which SoC are you testing this on? I assume RK3568, right? Which patch
introduces that regression, the first or the second one?
I tested on the Odroid M, which is rk3568.
I have only applied them both, as I was under the impression that both are
needed for the 4k support.

Yes, both I needed, but I am interested which one introduces the
regression as I can't reproduce it.

One thing that might be worthwhile is to compare what "drm.debug=4" output says about the chosen mode and its clock rate vs. what /sys/kernel/debug/clk/clk_summary says about how things ended up in practice, to see whether it's a case of the clock not being able to get close enough to the correct rate at all.

Robin.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux