Re: [PATCH v2 15/17] drm/i915/vm_bind: Handle persistent vmas in execbuf3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 01:18:27PM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 03/10/2022 07:12, Niranjana Vishwanathapura wrote:
Handle persistent (VM_BIND) mappings during the request submission
in the execbuf3 path.

v2: Ensure requests wait for bindings to complete.

Signed-off-by: Niranjana Vishwanathapura <niranjana.vishwanathapura@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c   | 214 +++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 213 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
index 66b723842e45..5cece16949d8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer3.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include "i915_gem_vm_bind.h"
 #include "i915_trace.h"
+#define __EXEC3_HAS_PIN			BIT_ULL(33)
 #define __EXEC3_ENGINE_PINNED		BIT_ULL(32)
 #define __EXEC3_INTERNAL_FLAGS		(~0ull << 32)
@@ -42,7 +43,9 @@
  * execlist. Hence, no support for implicit sync.
  *
  * The new execbuf3 ioctl only works in VM_BIND mode and the VM_BIND mode only
- * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission.
+ * works with execbuf3 ioctl for submission. All BOs mapped on that VM (through
+ * VM_BIND call) at the time of execbuf3 call are deemed required for that
+ * submission.
  *
  * The execbuf3 ioctl directly specifies the batch addresses instead of as
  * object handles as in execbuf2 ioctl. The execbuf3 ioctl will also not
@@ -58,6 +61,13 @@
  * So, a lot of code supporting execbuf2 ioctl, like relocations, VA evictions,
  * vma lookup table, implicit sync, vma active reference tracking etc., are not
  * applicable for execbuf3 ioctl.
+ *
+ * During each execbuf submission, request fence is added to all VM_BIND mapped
+ * objects with DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP. The DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage will
+ * prevent over sync (See enum dma_resv_usage). Note that DRM_I915_GEM_WAIT and
+ * DRM_I915_GEM_BUSY ioctls do not check for DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP usage and
+ * hence should not be used for end of batch check. Instead, the execbuf3
+ * timeline out fence should be used for end of batch check.
  */
 /**
@@ -127,6 +137,23 @@ eb_find_vma(struct i915_address_space *vm, u64 addr)
 	return i915_gem_vm_bind_lookup_vma(vm, va);
 }
+static void eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(struct i915_address_space *vm)
+{
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
+
+	/**
+	 * Move all unbound vmas back into vm_bind_list so that they are
+	 * revalidated.
+	 */
+	spin_lock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_rebind_list, vm_rebind_link) {
+		list_del_init(&vma->vm_rebind_link);
+		if (!list_empty(&vma->vm_bind_link))
+			list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bind_list);
+	}
+	spin_unlock(&vm->vm_rebind_lock);
+}
+
 static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
 	unsigned int i, current_batch = 0;
@@ -141,14 +168,121 @@ static int eb_lookup_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 		++current_batch;
 	}
+	eb_scoop_unbound_vma_all(eb->context->vm);
+
 	return 0;
 }
+static int eb_lock_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int err;
+
+	err = i915_gem_object_lock(eb->context->vm->root_obj, &eb->ww);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
+		err = i915_gem_object_lock(vma->obj, &eb->ww);
+		if (err)
+			return err;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void eb_release_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
+					  bool final)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *vn;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+
+	if (!(eb->args->flags & __EXEC3_HAS_PIN))
+		return;
+
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link)
+		__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+
+	eb->args->flags &= ~__EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
+	if (!final)
+		return;
+
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, vn, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link)
+		if (i915_vma_verify_bind_complete(vma))
+			list_move_tail(&vma->vm_bind_link, &vm->vm_bound_list);
+}
+
 static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, bool final)
 {
+	eb_release_persistent_vma_all(eb, final);
 	eb_unpin_engine(eb);
 }
+static int eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vm->root_obj->base.resv, 1);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link) {
+		ret = dma_resv_reserve_fences(vma->obj->base.resv, 1);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma, *last_pinned_vma = NULL;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	ret = eb_reserve_fence_for_persistent_vma_all(eb);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (list_empty(&vm->vm_bind_list))
+		return 0;
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
+		u64 pin_flags = vma->start | PIN_OFFSET_FIXED | PIN_USER;

Is it possible to use PIN_VALIDATE here? IIRC the idea behind that was to avoid short term pinning in execbuf, which is not very friendly for eviction, and rather just have the object lock and/or dma-resv activity to protect the binding. If so, could maybe also use it in the vm_bind ioctl.


Ok, will update both in execbuf3 and vm_bind ioctls.

Regards,
Niranjana

+
+		ret = i915_vma_pin_ww(vma, &eb->ww, 0, 0, pin_flags);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+
+		last_pinned_vma = vma;
+	}
+
+	if (ret && last_pinned_vma) {
+		list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
+			__i915_vma_unpin(vma);
+			if (vma == last_pinned_vma)
+				break;
+		}
+	} else if (last_pinned_vma) {
+		eb->args->flags |= __EXEC3_HAS_PIN;
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 /*
  * Using two helper loops for the order of which requests / batches are created
  * and added the to backend. Requests are created in order from the parent to
@@ -160,13 +294,74 @@ static void eb_release_vma_all(struct i915_execbuffer *eb, bool final)
  */
 #define for_each_batch_create_order(_eb) \
 	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < (_eb)->num_batches; ++i)
+#define for_each_batch_add_order(_eb) \
+	for (int i = (_eb)->num_batches - 1; i >= 0; --i)
+
+static void __eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
+					     struct dma_fence *fence)
+{
+	dma_resv_add_fence(obj->base.resv, fence, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
+	obj->write_domain = 0;
+	obj->read_domains |= I915_GEM_GPU_DOMAINS;
+	obj->mm.dirty = true;
+}
+
+static void eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct dma_fence *fence;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+
+	fence = eb->composite_fence ? eb->composite_fence :
+		&eb->requests[0]->fence;
+
+	__eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vm->root_obj, fence);
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->non_priv_vm_bind_list,
+			    non_priv_vm_bind_link)
+		__eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(vma->obj, fence);
+}
+
+static void eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
+{
+	/* Add fence to BOs dma-resv fence list */
+	eb_persistent_add_shared_fence(eb);
+}
 static int eb_move_to_gpu(struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
 {
+	struct i915_address_space *vm = eb->context->vm;
+	struct i915_vma *vma;
+	int err = 0;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&vm->vm_bind_lock);
+	assert_object_held(vm->root_obj);
+
+	eb_move_all_persistent_vma_to_active(eb);
+
+	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->vm_bind_list, vm_bind_link) {
+		for_each_batch_add_order(eb) {
+			if (!eb->requests[i])
+				continue;
+
+			err = i915_request_await_bind(eb->requests[i], vma);
+			if (err)
+				goto err_skip;
+		}
+	}
+
 	/* Unconditionally flush any chipset caches (for streaming writes). */
 	intel_gt_chipset_flush(eb->gt);
 	return 0;
+
+err_skip:
+	for_each_batch_create_order(eb) {
+		if (!eb->requests[i])
+			break;
+
+		i915_request_set_error_once(eb->requests[i], err);
+	}
+	return err;
 }
 static int eb_request_submit(struct i915_execbuffer *eb,
@@ -478,6 +673,7 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 	mutex_lock(&eb.context->vm->vm_bind_lock);
+lookup_vmas:
 	err = eb_lookup_vma_all(&eb);
 	if (err) {
 		eb_release_vma_all(&eb, true);
@@ -494,6 +690,22 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev,
 	/* only throttle once, even if we didn't need to throttle */
 	throttle = false;
+	err = eb_lock_vma_all(&eb);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_validate;
+
+	/**
+	 * No object unbinds possible once the objects are locked. So,
+	 * check for any unbinds here, which needs to be scooped up.
+	 */
+	if (!list_empty(&eb.context->vm->vm_rebind_list)) {
+		eb_release_vma_all(&eb, true);
+		i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&eb.ww);
+		goto lookup_vmas;
+	}
+
+	err = eb_validate_persistent_vma_all(&eb);
+
 err_validate:
 	if (err == -EDEADLK) {
 		eb_release_vma_all(&eb, false);



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux