On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 06:46:48PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
The part of the media and blitter engine contexts that we care about for
setting up an initial state are the same on MTL as they were on DG2
(and PVC), so we need to update the driver conditions to re-use the DG2
context table.
this paragraph doesn't match what you are doing in the patch. Which one
is correct? From "v2" below it looks like the original intention was to
just reuse and now they are changed.
For render/compute engines, the part of the context images are nearly
the same, although the layout had a very slight change --- one POSH
register was removed and the placement of some LRI/noops adjusted
slightly to compensate.
v2:
- Dg2, mtl xcs offsets slightly vary. Use a separate offsets array(Bala)
- Add missing nop in xcs offsets(Bala)
v3:
- Fix the spacing for nop in xcs offset(MattR)
v4:
- Fix rcs register offset(MattR)
Bspec: 46261, 46260, 45585
Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
index 3955292483a6..c7937d8d120a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
@@ -264,6 +264,39 @@ static const u8 dg2_xcs_offsets[] = {
END
};
+static const u8 mtl_xcs_offsets[] = {
+ NOP(1),
+ LRI(13, POSTED),
+ REG16(0x244),
+ REG(0x034),
+ REG(0x030),
+ REG(0x038),
+ REG(0x03c),
+ REG(0x168),
+ REG(0x140),
+ REG(0x110),
+ REG(0x1c0),
+ REG(0x1c4),
+ REG(0x1c8),
+ REG(0x180),
+ REG16(0x2b4),
are we missing 0x120 here?
+ NOP(4),
NOP(2), but it seems this is here to
overcome the missing 0x120?
+
+ NOP(1),
+ LRI(9, POSTED),
+ REG16(0x3a8),
+ REG16(0x28c),
+ REG16(0x288),
+ REG16(0x284),
+ REG16(0x280),
+ REG16(0x27c),
+ REG16(0x278),
+ REG16(0x274),
+ REG16(0x270),
+
+ END
+};
+
static const u8 gen8_rcs_offsets[] = {
NOP(1),
LRI(14, POSTED),
@@ -606,6 +639,49 @@ static const u8 dg2_rcs_offsets[] = {
END
};
+static const u8 mtl_rcs_offsets[] = {
+ NOP(1),
+ LRI(15, POSTED),
+ REG16(0x244),
+ REG(0x034),
+ REG(0x030),
+ REG(0x038),
+ REG(0x03c),
+ REG(0x168),
+ REG(0x140),
+ REG(0x110),
+ REG(0x1c0),
+ REG(0x1c4),
+ REG(0x1c8),
+ REG(0x180),
+ REG16(0x2b4),
+ REG(0x120),
+ REG(0x124),
+
+ NOP(1),
+ LRI(9, POSTED),
humn... set_offsets() is forcing MI_LRI_LRM_CS_MMIO
for ver >= 11, although here bspec shows this MI_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM
doesn't have it set.
+Mika, +Chris
Lucas De Marchi
+ REG16(0x3a8),
+ REG16(0x28c),
+ REG16(0x288),
+ REG16(0x284),
+ REG16(0x280),
+ REG16(0x27c),
+ REG16(0x278),
+ REG16(0x274),
+ REG16(0x270),
+
+ NOP(2),
+ LRI(2, POSTED),
+ REG16(0x5a8),
+ REG16(0x5ac),
+
+ NOP(6),
+ LRI(1, 0),
+ REG(0x0c8),
+
+ END
+};
+
#undef END
#undef REG16
#undef REG
@@ -624,7 +700,9 @@ static const u8 *reg_offsets(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
!intel_engine_has_relative_mmio(engine));
if (engine->flags & I915_ENGINE_HAS_RCS_REG_STATE) {
- if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55))
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
+ return mtl_rcs_offsets;
+ else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55))
return dg2_rcs_offsets;
else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 50))
return xehp_rcs_offsets;
@@ -637,7 +715,9 @@ static const u8 *reg_offsets(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
else
return gen8_rcs_offsets;
} else {
- if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55))
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 70))
+ return mtl_xcs_offsets;
+ else if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(engine->i915) >= IP_VER(12, 55))
return dg2_xcs_offsets;
else if (GRAPHICS_VER(engine->i915) >= 12)
return gen12_xcs_offsets;
--
2.34.1
