On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 1:04 PM Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 16.09.2022 20:17, Jagan Teki wrote: > > This series supports common bridge support for Samsung MIPI DSIM > > which is used in Exynos and i.MX8MM SoC's. > > > > Previous v4 can be available here [1], repo on linux-next [2] and > > Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SoM boot log [3]. > > > > The final bridge supports both the Exynos and i.MX8MM DSI devices. > > > > Changes for v3: > > * bridge changes to support multi-arch > > * updated and clear commit messages > > * add hw_type via plat data > > * removed unneeded quirk > > * rebased on linux-next > > > > Changes for v4: > > * include Inki Dae in MAINTAINERS > > * remove dsi_driver probe in exynos_drm_drv to support multi-arch build > > * update init handling to ensure host init done on first cmd transfer > > > > Changes for v3: > > * fix the mult-arch build > > * fix dsi host init > > * updated commit messages > > > > Changes for v2: > > * fix bridge handling > > * fix dsi host init > > * correct the commit messages > > > > Patch 0001: Restore proper bridge chain in exynos_dsi > > > > Patch 0002: Samsung DSIM bridge > > > > Patch 0003: PHY optional > > > > Patch 0004: OF-graph or Child node lookup > > > > Patch 0005: DSI host initialization > > > > Patch 0006: atomic check > > > > Patch 0007: PMS_P offset via plat data > > > > Patch 0008: atomic_get_input_bus_fmts > > > > Patch 0009: input_bus_flags > > > > Patch 0010: document fsl,imx8mm-mipi-dsim > > > > Patch 0011: add i.MX8MM DSIM support > > > > [3] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=f5b98b61-94329e52-f5b8002e-000babff9bb7-1f9a3bf1da680bc2&q=1&e=efefced1-2052-43c5-834f-b50867c29e3c&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgist.github.com%2Fopenedev%2F22b2d63b30ade0ba55ab414a2f47aaf0 > > [2] https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=02c0a3da-634bb6e9-02c12895-000babff9bb7-8ed3eab856890e56&q=1&e=efefced1-2052-43c5-834f-b50867c29e3c&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fopenedev%2Fkernel%2Ftree%2Fimx8mm-dsi-v5 > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/dri-devel/cover/20220829184031.1863663-1-jagan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Any inputs? > > Just to make it clear. Like I already pointed [1], this version breaks > Exynos boards with DSI panels. Either the patch #1 has to be dropped to > keep the current hack (the current code changes the bridge order to > force proper pre_enable calls) or the Dave's patches have to be applied > first [3]. Yes, I understand overall. Working on checking Dave's changes in the Allwinner DSI host. If it doesn't impact it I will send next version by including Dave's patches. Thanks, Jagan.
