On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 09:09:13AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 19/09/2022 23:18, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 06:03:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 16/09/2022 21:00, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > >>> From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Add compatibles for the DisplayPort and Embedded DisplayPort blocks in > >>> Qualcomm SDM845 and SC8280XP platforms. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> No need for quicinc SoB (unless you also take ownership). > >> > > > > It's my understanding that both needs to be there. Bjorn @ Linaro > > authored the patch and the author must certify its origin, but as the > > submitter I must certify its origin. > > It's the same person. There are no two Bjorns (unless there are :) ), so > you certify with old email. SoB chain is coming from people, not email > addresses. > IANAL, but I don't think it's the same person. I can't use my old signature to certify the origin in a contribution today and I can't claim authorship of something Linaro did. > And it is not only my understanding of SoB chain. > https://lore.kernel.org/all/YuKcBO5JatwRYQJ3@xxxxxxxxx/ > Again, IANAL, but I think the situation is different given AMD and Xilinx relationship. > > > > I'm not entirely sure what you mean about taking ownership, > > I meant you to be the author of the commit. > As mentioned above, I can't do that. Regards, Bjorn > > I am going > > to pursue getting these patches landed. But it wouldn't be correct for > > new me to claim I authored them. > > Yeah, that's true. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
