Re: [BUG] ls1046a: eDMA does not transfer data from I2C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 9/20/22 11:24 AM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/20/22 6:07 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2022-09-19 23:24, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I discovered a bug in either imx_i2c or fsl-edma on the LS1046A where no
>>> data is read in i2c_imx_dma_read except for the last two bytes (which
>>> are not read using DMA). This is perhaps best illustrated with the
>>> following example:
>>>
>>> # hexdump -C /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/0-00540/nvmem
>>> [  308.914884] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 0x0000000889380000 0x00000000f5401000 ffff000075401000
>>> [  308.923529] src= 2180004 dst=f5401000 attr=   0 soff=   0 nbytes=1 slast=       0
>>> [  308.923529] citer=  7e biter=  7e doff=   1 dlast_sga=       0
>>> [  308.923529] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0
>>> [  308.942113] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: submitted
>>> [  308.974049] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: marked complete
>>> [  308.981339] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00]
>>> [  309.002226] i2c i2c-0: ffff000075401000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00]
>>> [  309.024649] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 0x0000000889380080 0x00000000f5401800 ffff000075401800
>>> [  309.033270] src= 2180004 dst=f5401800 attr=   0 soff=   0 nbytes=1 slast=       0
>>> [  309.033270] citer=  7e biter=  7e doff=   1 dlast_sga=       0
>>> [  309.033270] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0
>>> [  309.051633] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: submitted
>>> [  309.083526] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: marked complete
>>> [  309.090807] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00]
>>> [  309.111694] i2c i2c-0: ffff000075401800 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00]
>>> 00000000  2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e  2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73  |../../../devices|
>>> 00000010  2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72  6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31  |/platform/soc/21|
>>> 00000020  38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32  63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f  |80000.i2c/i2c-0/|
>>> 00000030  30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30  2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00  |0-0054/0-00540..|
>>> 00000040  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
>>> *
>>> 00000070  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff  |................|
>>> 00000080  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
>>> *
>>> 000000f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 5b  |...............[|
>>> 00000100
>>>
>>> (patch with my debug prints appended below)
>>>
>>> Despite the DMA completing successfully, no data was copied into the
>>> buffer, leaving the original (now junk) contents. I probed the I2C bus
>>> with an oscilloscope, and I verified that the transfer did indeed occur.
>>> The timing between submission and completion seems reasonable for the
>>> bus speed (50 kHz for whatever reason).
>>>
>>> I had a look over the I2C driver, and nothing looked obviously
>>> incorrect. If anyone has ideas on what to try, I'm more than willing.
>> 
>> Is the DMA controller cache-coherent? I see the mainline LS1046A DT doesn't have a "dma-coherent" property for it, but the behaviour is entirely consistent with that being wrong - dma_map_single() cleans the cache, coherent DMA write hits the still-present cache lines, dma_unmap_single() invalidates the cache, and boom, the data is gone and you read back the previous content of the buffer that was cleaned out to DRAM beforehand.
> 
> I've tried both with and without [1] applied. I also tried removing the
> call to dma_unmap_single, but to no effect.

Actually, I wasn't updating my device tree like I thought...

Turns out I2C works only *without* this patch.

So maybe the eDMA is not coherent?

--Sean

> --Sean
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220915233432.31660-6-leoyang.li@xxxxxxx/
> 
>>> --Sean
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
>>> index 15896e2413c4..1d9d4a55d2af 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c
>>> @@ -391,6 +391,12 @@ void fsl_edma_fill_tcd(struct fsl_edma_hw_tcd *tcd, u32 src, u32 dst,
>>>   {
>>>          u16 csr = 0;
>>>   +       pr_info("src=%8x dst=%8x attr=%4x soff=%4x nbytes=%u slast=%8x\n"
>>> +               "citer=%4x biter=%4x doff=%4x dlast_sga=%8x\n"
>>> +               "major_int=%d disable_req=%d enable_sg=%d\n",
>>> +               src, dst, attr, soff, nbytes, slast, citer, biter, doff,
>>> +               dlast_sga, major_int, disable_req, enable_sg);
>>> +
>>>          /*
>>>           * eDMA hardware SGs require the TCDs to be stored in little
>>>           * endian format irrespective of the register endian model.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>>> index 3576b63a6c03..0217f0cb1331 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c
>>> @@ -402,6 +402,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_xfer(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>>>                  dev_err(dev, "DMA mapping failed\n");
>>>                  goto err_map;
>>>          }
>>> +       phys_addr_t bufp = virt_to_phys(msgs->buf);
>>> +       dev_info(dev, "%px %pap %pad %px\n", msgs->buf, &bufp,
>>> +                &dma->dma_buf, phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf));
>>>            txdesc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma->chan_using, dma->dma_buf,
>>>                                          dma->dma_len, dma->dma_transfer_dir,
>>> @@ -965,6 +968,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx,
>>>                  }
>>>                  schedule();
>>>          }
>>> +       dev_info(dev, "%px = [%*ph]\n", msgs->buf, msgs->len, msgs->buf);
>>> +       dev_info(dev, "%px = [%*ph]\n", phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf), msgs->len,
>>> +                phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf));
>>>            temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR);
>>>          temp &= ~I2CR_DMAEN;
> 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux