On 9/20/22 11:24 AM, Sean Anderson wrote: > > > On 9/20/22 6:07 AM, Robin Murphy wrote: >> On 2022-09-19 23:24, Sean Anderson wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I discovered a bug in either imx_i2c or fsl-edma on the LS1046A where no >>> data is read in i2c_imx_dma_read except for the last two bytes (which >>> are not read using DMA). This is perhaps best illustrated with the >>> following example: >>> >>> # hexdump -C /sys/bus/nvmem/devices/0-00540/nvmem >>> [ 308.914884] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 0x0000000889380000 0x00000000f5401000 ffff000075401000 >>> [ 308.923529] src= 2180004 dst=f5401000 attr= 0 soff= 0 nbytes=1 slast= 0 >>> [ 308.923529] citer= 7e biter= 7e doff= 1 dlast_sga= 0 >>> [ 308.923529] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0 >>> [ 308.942113] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: submitted >>> [ 308.974049] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[4]: marked complete >>> [ 308.981339] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00] >>> [ 309.002226] i2c i2c-0: ffff000075401000 = [2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00] >>> [ 309.024649] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 0x0000000889380080 0x00000000f5401800 ffff000075401800 >>> [ 309.033270] src= 2180004 dst=f5401800 attr= 0 soff= 0 nbytes=1 slast= 0 >>> [ 309.033270] citer= 7e biter= 7e doff= 1 dlast_sga= 0 >>> [ 309.033270] major_int=1 disable_req=1 enable_sg=0 >>> [ 309.051633] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: vchan 000000001b4371fc: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: submitted >>> [ 309.083526] fsl-edma 2c00000.edma: txd 00000000d9dd26c5[5]: marked complete >>> [ 309.090807] i2c i2c-0: ffff000809380080 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00] >>> [ 309.111694] i2c i2c-0: ffff000075401800 = [00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00] >>> 00000000 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 2e 2e 2f 64 65 76 69 63 65 73 |../../../devices| >>> 00000010 2f 70 6c 61 74 66 6f 72 6d 2f 73 6f 63 2f 32 31 |/platform/soc/21| >>> 00000020 38 30 30 30 30 2e 69 32 63 2f 69 32 63 2d 30 2f |80000.i2c/i2c-0/| >>> 00000030 30 2d 30 30 35 34 2f 30 2d 30 30 35 34 30 00 00 |0-0054/0-00540..| >>> 00000040 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| >>> * >>> 00000070 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff |................| >>> 00000080 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| >>> * >>> 000000f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff 5b |...............[| >>> 00000100 >>> >>> (patch with my debug prints appended below) >>> >>> Despite the DMA completing successfully, no data was copied into the >>> buffer, leaving the original (now junk) contents. I probed the I2C bus >>> with an oscilloscope, and I verified that the transfer did indeed occur. >>> The timing between submission and completion seems reasonable for the >>> bus speed (50 kHz for whatever reason). >>> >>> I had a look over the I2C driver, and nothing looked obviously >>> incorrect. If anyone has ideas on what to try, I'm more than willing. >> >> Is the DMA controller cache-coherent? I see the mainline LS1046A DT doesn't have a "dma-coherent" property for it, but the behaviour is entirely consistent with that being wrong - dma_map_single() cleans the cache, coherent DMA write hits the still-present cache lines, dma_unmap_single() invalidates the cache, and boom, the data is gone and you read back the previous content of the buffer that was cleaned out to DRAM beforehand. > > I've tried both with and without [1] applied. I also tried removing the > call to dma_unmap_single, but to no effect. Actually, I wasn't updating my device tree like I thought... Turns out I2C works only *without* this patch. So maybe the eDMA is not coherent? --Sean > --Sean > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20220915233432.31660-6-leoyang.li@xxxxxxx/ > >>> --Sean >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c >>> index 15896e2413c4..1d9d4a55d2af 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c >>> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsl-edma-common.c >>> @@ -391,6 +391,12 @@ void fsl_edma_fill_tcd(struct fsl_edma_hw_tcd *tcd, u32 src, u32 dst, >>> { >>> u16 csr = 0; >>> + pr_info("src=%8x dst=%8x attr=%4x soff=%4x nbytes=%u slast=%8x\n" >>> + "citer=%4x biter=%4x doff=%4x dlast_sga=%8x\n" >>> + "major_int=%d disable_req=%d enable_sg=%d\n", >>> + src, dst, attr, soff, nbytes, slast, citer, biter, doff, >>> + dlast_sga, major_int, disable_req, enable_sg); >>> + >>> /* >>> * eDMA hardware SGs require the TCDs to be stored in little >>> * endian format irrespective of the register endian model. >>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >>> index 3576b63a6c03..0217f0cb1331 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx.c >>> @@ -402,6 +402,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_xfer(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, >>> dev_err(dev, "DMA mapping failed\n"); >>> goto err_map; >>> } >>> + phys_addr_t bufp = virt_to_phys(msgs->buf); >>> + dev_info(dev, "%px %pap %pad %px\n", msgs->buf, &bufp, >>> + &dma->dma_buf, phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf)); >>> txdesc = dmaengine_prep_slave_single(dma->chan_using, dma->dma_buf, >>> dma->dma_len, dma->dma_transfer_dir, >>> @@ -965,6 +968,9 @@ static int i2c_imx_dma_read(struct imx_i2c_struct *i2c_imx, >>> } >>> schedule(); >>> } >>> + dev_info(dev, "%px = [%*ph]\n", msgs->buf, msgs->len, msgs->buf); >>> + dev_info(dev, "%px = [%*ph]\n", phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf), msgs->len, >>> + phys_to_virt(dma->dma_buf)); >>> temp = imx_i2c_read_reg(i2c_imx, IMX_I2C_I2CR); >>> temp &= ~I2CR_DMAEN; >