On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 2:17 PM Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/9/22 16:44, jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 12:19 PM Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/4/22 17:40, Jim Cromie wrote:
> >>> Add module-to-class validation:
> >>>
> >>> #> echo class DRM_UT_KMS +p > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
> >>>
> >>> If a query has "class FOO", then ddebug_find_valid_class(), called
> >>> from ddebug_change(), requires that FOO is known to module X,
> >>> otherwize the query is skipped entirely for X. This protects each
> >>> module's class-space, other than the default:31.
> >>>
> >>> The authors' choice of FOO is highly selective, giving isolation
> >>> and/or coordinated sharing of FOOs. For example, only DRM modules
> >>> should know and respond to DRM_UT_KMS.
> >>>
> >>> So this, combined with module's opt-in declaration of known classes,
> >>> effectively privatizes the .class_id space for each module (or
> >>> coordinated set of modules).
> >>>
> >>> Notes:
> >>>
> >>> For all "class FOO" queries, ddebug_find_valid_class() is called, it
> >>> returns the map matching the query, and sets valid_class via an
> >>> *outvar).
> >>>
> >>> If no "class FOO" is supplied, valid_class = _CLASS_DFLT. This
> >>> insures that legacy queries do not trample on new class'd callsites,
> >>> as they get added.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> I'm wondering about the case where we have a callsite which is marked
> >> as 'class foo', but the query string is done by say module and file, so:
> >>
> >> # echo "module bar file foo.c +p" > /proc/dynamic_debug_control
> >>
> >> With the proposed code, I think this ends up not enabling anything right?
> >
> > correct - the only way to enable : pr_debug_cls(CL_FOO, " ...")
> > is
> > echo class CL_FOO +p > control
> >
> > 1st, existing dyndbg query uses, whether ad-hoc or scripted,
> > were not written in anticipation of new / classified subsystems.
> >
> > 2nd, new class users dont want to sit in coach. no damn legroom.
> >
> > 3rd, consider DRM, which already has drm.debug
> > ie: /sys/module/drm/parameters/debug
> > and prefers it, at least by inertia.
> > protecting these new class'd callsites (3-5k of them)
> > from casual (unintended) manipulations of the kernel-wide
> > dyndbg state seems prudent, and a usability win.
> >
> > Not everyone will use module bar, requiring "class foo"
> > guarantees that changes are intentional.
> >
>
> I sort of get that your trying to protect these from unintended toggling,
> but I would say it's that's not really new with these statements,
Whats new here is the customer - a whole new subsystem.
theyre accustomed to a single point of control,
/sys/module/drm/parameters/debug,
and dont particularly value the infinite variety of combos under the hood.
Theyre here for (Im selling them on) the JUMP_LABEL.
Isolation from unintended manipulations under the hood
(which is afterall a global kernel state) seems like a good guarantee.
IOW class isolation from non-class, and from other INDEPENDENT classes.
Only LEVEL types have any interdependence, and only with the other level
classnames in the declared group.
Ultimately, whats the client want ?
I know my banker handles other folks money too,
but I can reasonably expect isolation from their businesses.
> prr_debug() come and go before and I'm not aware of this is an issue.
> And in any case, a query can be modified.
but youre requiring they be modified, so as not to scribble all over DRM_*,
which wasnt there when they fiddled.
> I think what bugs me is now query stuff works differently. Previously,
> all the query strings - 'module', 'file', 'line', 'format', were
> used as additional selectors, but now we have this new one 'class'
> that works differently as it's requited for pr_debug_cls() statements.
>
theres a "when-in-rome" argument here, if DRM is Rome.
> >
> >
> >> Because valid class is set to _DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT and then:
> >> 'dp->class_id != valid_class' is true?
> >>
> >> This seems confusing to me as a user as this doesn't work like the
> >> other queries....so maybe we should only do the
> >> 'dp->class_id != valid_class' check *if* query->class_string is set,
> >> see below.
> >>
> >
> > Could you clarify whether you think this is a logic error
> > or a frame-of-reference difference as elaborated above ?
>
> 'frame-of-reference' I'm questioning the how 'class' works as mentioned
> above not the implementation.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Jason
>
> >
> > ISTM theres a place for a well-worded paragraph in doc
> > about the class distinction, perhaps a whole for-authors section.
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Also add a new column to control-file output, displaying non-default
> >>> class-name (when found) or the "unknown _id:", if it has not been
> >>> (correctly) declared with one of the declarator macros.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> lib/dynamic_debug.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> >>> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> >>> index b71efd0b491d..db96ded78c3f 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> >>> +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
> >>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ struct ddebug_query {
> >>> const char *module;
> >>> const char *function;
> >>> const char *format;
> >>> + const char *class_string;
> >>> unsigned int first_lineno, last_lineno;
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> @@ -136,15 +137,33 @@ static void vpr_info_dq(const struct ddebug_query *query, const char *msg)
> >>> fmtlen--;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> - v3pr_info("%s: func=\"%s\" file=\"%s\" module=\"%s\" format=\"%.*s\" lineno=%u-%u\n",
> >>> - msg,
> >>> - query->function ?: "",
> >>> - query->filename ?: "",
> >>> - query->module ?: "",
> >>> - fmtlen, query->format ?: "",
> >>> - query->first_lineno, query->last_lineno);
> >>> + v3pr_info("%s: func=\"%s\" file=\"%s\" module=\"%s\" format=\"%.*s\" lineno=%u-%u class=%s\n",
> >>> + msg,
> >>> + query->function ?: "",
> >>> + query->filename ?: "",
> >>> + query->module ?: "",
> >>> + fmtlen, query->format ?: "",
> >>> + query->first_lineno, query->last_lineno, query->class_string);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +static struct ddebug_class_map *ddebug_find_valid_class(struct ddebug_table const *dt,
> >>> + const char *class_string, int *class_id)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct ddebug_class_map *map;
> >>> + int idx;
> >>> +
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(map, &dt->maps, link) {
> >>> + idx = match_string(map->class_names, map->length, class_string);
> >>> + if (idx >= 0) {
> >>> + *class_id = idx + map->base;
> >>> + return map;
> >>> + }
> >>> + }
> >>> + *class_id = -ENOENT;
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +#define __outvar /* filled by callee */
> >>> /*
> >>> * Search the tables for _ddebug's which match the given `query' and
> >>> * apply the `flags' and `mask' to them. Returns number of matching
> >>> @@ -159,6 +178,8 @@ static int ddebug_change(const struct ddebug_query *query,
> >>> unsigned int newflags;
> >>> unsigned int nfound = 0;
> >>> struct flagsbuf fbuf, nbuf;
> >>> + struct ddebug_class_map *map = NULL;
> >>> + int __outvar valid_class;
> >>>
> >>> /* search for matching ddebugs */
> >>> mutex_lock(&ddebug_lock);
> >>> @@ -169,9 +190,22 @@ static int ddebug_change(const struct ddebug_query *query,
> >>> !match_wildcard(query->module, dt->mod_name))
> >>> continue;
> >>>
> >>> + if (query->class_string) {
> >>> + map = ddebug_find_valid_class(dt, query->class_string, &valid_class);
> >>> + if (!map)
> >>> + continue;
> >>
> >> So remove the else here.
> >>
> >>> + } else {
> >>> + /* constrain query, do not touch class'd callsites */
> >>> + valid_class = _DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT;
> >>> + }
> >>> +
> >>> for (i = 0; i < dt->num_ddebugs; i++) {
> >>> struct _ddebug *dp = &dt->ddebugs[i];
> >>>
> >>> + /* match site against query-class */
> >>> + if (dp->class_id != valid_class)
> >>
> >> And then make this: if (query->class_string && (dp->class_id != valid_class))
> >>
> >> thoughts?
> >>
> >>
> >>> + continue;
> >>> +> /* match against the source filename */
> >>> if (query->filename &&
> >>> !match_wildcard(query->filename, dp->filename) &&
> >>> @@ -420,6 +454,8 @@ static int ddebug_parse_query(char *words[], int nwords,
> >>> } else if (!strcmp(keyword, "line")) {
> >>> if (parse_linerange(query, arg))
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> + } else if (!strcmp(keyword, "class")) {
> >>> + rc = check_set(&query->class_string, arg, "class");
> >>> } else {
> >>> pr_err("unknown keyword \"%s\"\n", keyword);
> >>> return -EINVAL;
> >>> @@ -854,6 +890,20 @@ static void *ddebug_proc_next(struct seq_file *m, void *p, loff_t *pos)
> >>> return dp;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> +#define class_in_range(class_id, map) \
> >>> + (class_id >= map->base && class_id < map->base + map->length)
> >>> +
> >>> +static const char *ddebug_class_name(struct ddebug_iter *iter, struct _ddebug *dp)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct ddebug_class_map *map;
> >>> +
> >>> + list_for_each_entry(map, &iter->table->maps, link)
> >>> + if (class_in_range(dp->class_id, map))
> >>> + return map->class_names[dp->class_id - map->base];
> >>> +
> >>> + return NULL;
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> /*
> >>> * Seq_ops show method. Called several times within a read()
> >>> * call from userspace, with ddebug_lock held. Formats the
> >>> @@ -865,6 +915,7 @@ static int ddebug_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> >>> struct ddebug_iter *iter = m->private;
> >>> struct _ddebug *dp = p;
> >>> struct flagsbuf flags;
> >>> + char const *class;
> >>>
> >>> if (p == SEQ_START_TOKEN) {
> >>> seq_puts(m,
> >>> @@ -877,7 +928,16 @@ static int ddebug_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *p)
> >>> iter->table->mod_name, dp->function,
> >>> ddebug_describe_flags(dp->flags, &flags));
> >>> seq_escape_str(m, dp->format, ESCAPE_SPACE, "\t\r\n\"");
> >>> - seq_puts(m, "\"\n");
> >>> + seq_puts(m, "\"");
> >>> +
> >>> + if (dp->class_id != _DPRINTK_CLASS_DFLT) {
> >>> + class = ddebug_class_name(iter, dp);
> >>> + if (class)
> >>> + seq_printf(m, " class:%s", class);
> >>> + else
> >>> + seq_printf(m, " class unknown, _id:%d", dp->class_id);
> >>> + }
> >>> + seq_puts(m, "\n");
> >>>
> >>> return 0;
> >>> }
