Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: fix repeated words in comments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 10:50 AM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 2022-09-07 12:26, Jilin Yuan wrote:
> > Delete the redundant word 'we'.
>
> FWIW, to me it's not redundant because while indeed it is not correct,
> it looks exactly like the kind of typo I might make of "if we", and
> parsing it as *that* does make sense. The sentence you end up with here
> can hardly be considered an improvement since it is still ungrammatical
> nonsense.

Yes, I believe this was supposed to say "if we" rather than "we we".

Alex

>
> Robin.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jilin Yuan <yuanjilin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > index 02cb3a12dd76..6d6cc4637d41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vce.c
> > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int amdgpu_vce_cs_reloc(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p, struct amdgpu_ib *ib,
> >    * @allocated: allocated a new handle?
> >    *
> >    * Validates the handle and return the found session index or -EINVAL
> > - * we we don't have another free session index.
> > + * we don't have another free session index.
> >    */
> >   static int amdgpu_vce_validate_handle(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
> >                                     uint32_t handle, uint32_t *allocated)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux