Hi Maxime,
W dniu 5.09.2022 o 15:32, Maxime Ripard pisze:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:14:28AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>> +enum drm_mode_analog {
>>>> + DRM_MODE_ANALOG_NTSC,
>>>> + DRM_MODE_ANALOG_PAL,
>>>> +};
>>>
>>> Using "NTSC" and "PAL" to describe the 50Hz and 60Hz analog TV modes is common,
>>> but strictly speaking a misnomer. Those are color encoding systems, and your
>>> patchset fully supports lesser used, but standard encodings for those (e.g.
>>> PAL-M for 60Hz and SECAM for 50Hz). I'd propose switching to some more neutral
>>> naming scheme. Some ideas:
>>>
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_60_HZ / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_50_HZ (after standard refresh rate)
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_525_LINES / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_625_LINES (after standard line
>>> count)
>>
>> IMHO these are bad names, as e.g. VGA640x480@60 is also analog, using
>> 60 Hz and 525 lines. Add "TV" to the name?
>>
>>> - DRM_MODE_ANALOG_JM / DRM_MODE_ANALOG_BDGHIKLN (after corresponding ITU System
>>> Letter Designations)
>>
>> Or DRM_MODE_ITU_*?
>> But given the long list of letters, this looks fragile to me.
>
> Does it matter at all? It's an internal API that isn't exposed at all.
> I'd rather have a common name that everyone can understand in this case
> rather than a *perfect* name where most will scratch their head
> wondering what it's about.
You may have a point. But in that case, maybe it'd make sense to at least add
a short comment explaining what do you mean by "NTSC" and "PAL" in this context?
Best regards,
Mateusz Kwiatkowski
