On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 02:18:37PM +0800, xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Dpi output needs to adjust the output format to dual edge for MT8186. > Because MT8186 HW has been modified at that time, SW needs to cooperate. > And the register (MMSYS) reserved for dpi will be used for output > format control (dual_edge/single_edge). > > Co-developed-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- [..] > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c [..] > * @yuv422_en_bit: Enable bit of yuv422. > * @csc_enable_bit: Enable bit of CSC. > * @pixels_per_iter: Quantity of transferred pixels per iteration. > + * @rgb888_dual_enable: Control output format for mt8186. Let's not mention mt8186 in the description to keep the property generic. Also, this description should say what having 'rgb888_dual_enable = true' indicates about the hardware (in this case mt8186) and it currently doesn't. Let's take a step back. What does 'dual enable' mean in this context and how does it relate to 'dual edge' and the dpi output format? By answering those questions we can find a description (and maybe variable name) that makes more sense. > */ [..] > @@ -449,6 +454,9 @@ static void mtk_dpi_dual_edge(struct mtk_dpi *dpi) > mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_OUTPUT_SETTING, > dpi->output_fmt == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_LE ? > EDGE_SEL : 0, EDGE_SEL); > + if (dpi->conf->rgb888_dual_enable) > + mtk_mmsys_ddp_dpi_fmt_config(dpi->mmsys_dev, DPI_RGB888_DDR_CON, > + DPI_FORMAT_MASK, NULL); This if block should be further indented. > } else { > mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_DDR_SETTING, DDR_EN | DDR_4PHASE, 0); > } [..] > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h > @@ -235,4 +235,8 @@ > #define MATRIX_SEL_RGB_TO_JPEG 0 > #define MATRIX_SEL_RGB_TO_BT601 2 > > +#define DPI_FORMAT_MASK 0x1 > +#define DPI_RGB888_DDR_CON BIT(0) > +#define DPI_RGB565_SDR_CON BIT(1) I'm not sure if it would make more sense to have these definitions in the mmsys header since they're configurations of a register in mmsys' iospace... I think we can keep them here but at least add a comment above: /* Values for DPI configuration in MMSYS address space */ Thanks, Nícolas