Comment # 61
on bug 60802
from Alex Deucher
(In reply to comment #59) > Alex, a couple of things changed in your last attachment. You removed the > L2T part, you reverted the "non_disp = 2" back to "non_disp = 1" and changed > the binary offset for 28 (instead of 27). Am I right to understand you set > "non_disp" back to 1 because your are offsetting one more bit (according to > your comment in v2)? The non_disp field is two bits on cayman and one bit evergreen. Bit 28 in this packet represents bit 0 of the non_disp field and bit 27 represents bit 1 of the non_disp field so that it's compatible with evergreen. So just setting bit 28 covers us for both evergreen and cayman since we only care about non_dip bit 0.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
