On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:52:53AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 12:43 AM Christian König > <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 12.07.22 um 06:22 schrieb John Stultz: > > > An initial pass at a drm_syncobj API test. > > > > > > Currently covers trivial use of: > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_CREATE > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_DESTROY > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_HANDLE_TO_FD > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_FD_TO_HANDLE > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_WAIT > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_RESET > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_SIGNAL > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE_WAIT > > > DRM_IOCTL_SYNCOBJ_TIMELINE_SIGNAL > > > > > > And demonstrates how the userspace API can be used, along with > > > some fairly simple bad parameter checking. > > > > > > The patch includes a few helpers taken from libdrm, as at least > > > on the VM I was testing with, I didn't have a new enough libdrm > > > to support the *_TIMELINE_* ioctls. Ideally the ioctl-helper bits > > > can be dropped at a later time. > > > > > > Feedback would be appreciated! > > > > DRM userspace selftests usually go either into libdrm or igt and not > > into the kernel source. > > Appreciate the pointer, I'll rework and submit to one of those projects. https://dri.freedesktop.org/docs/drm/gpu/drm-uapi.html#testing-and-validation There should be already a ton of syncobj tests, so probably more just work needed to make them work on vgem so we can test them all without a suitable hw driver loaded. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
