Also JFYI - I did see this comment but didn't address it in my respin, but only because I figured this might be better for a followup patch considering how much work is already in here On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 04:43 +0000, Lin, Wayne wrote: > I would prefer not using the term "available" which is a bit conflicting with > the idea in the reply of ENUM_PATH_RESOURCES - full PBN & available PBN. > Maybe better to change to use "full_slots"? > > Not yet finish all the patches. Will try to go through all the patches recently : ) -- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat