On 15.03.2013 0:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Only the DU0 VGA output is currently supported. Support for the DU0 LVDS and DU1 LVDS outputs will require information about the panels that will be connected to those outputs.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
arch/arm/configs/marzen_defconfig | 2 ++ arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c index cdcb799..0020506 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c
[...]
@@ -147,6 +148,38 @@ static struct platform_device hspi_device = { .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(hspi_resources), }; +/* DU */ +static struct resource rcar_du_resources[] = { + [0] = { + .name = "Display Unit", + .start = 0xfff80000, + .end = 0xfffb1007, + .flags = IORESOURCE_MEM, + }, + [1] = { + .start = gic_spi(31), + .flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ, + }, +}; + +static struct rcar_du_platform_data rcar_du_pdata = { + .encoders = { + [0] = { + .encoder = RCAR_DU_ENCODER_VGA, + }, + }, +}; + +static struct platform_device rcar_du_device = { + .name = "rcar-du", + .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_du_resources), + .resource = rcar_du_resources, + .dev = { + .platform_data = &rcar_du_pdata, + .coherent_dma_mask = ~0, + }, +}; +
Are we seeing again SoC device declared in the board file? That simply doesn't scale...
The goal is obviously to move all that to DT, but there's no DT bindings for the DU DRM driver yet.
I don't see how it justifies dubious non-DT design. Let me tell/remind you about the LTSI-3.4 tree where all this stuff can be backported and which doesn't have DT support, AFAIR.
WBR, Sergei _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
