Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: shmobile: marzen: Add Display Unit support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Friday 15 March 2013 02:11:05 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 15.03.2013 0:11, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Only the DU0 VGA output is currently supported. Support for the DU0 LVDS
> >>> and DU1 LVDS outputs will require information about the panels that will
> >>> be connected to those outputs.
> >>> 
> >>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> >>> <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>> 
> >>>    arch/arm/configs/marzen_defconfig     |  2 ++
> >>>    arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c | 65
> >>>    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>    2 files changed, 67 insertions(+)
> >>> 
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c
> >>> b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c index cdcb799..0020506 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-marzen.c
> >> 
> >> [...]
> >> 
> >>> @@ -147,6 +148,38 @@ static struct platform_device hspi_device = {
> >>>    	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(hspi_resources),
> >>>    };
> >>> 
> >>> +/* DU */
> >>> +static struct resource rcar_du_resources[] = {
> >>> +	[0] = {
> >>> +		.name	= "Display Unit",
> >>> +		.start	= 0xfff80000,
> >>> +		.end	= 0xfffb1007,
> >>> +		.flags	= IORESOURCE_MEM,
> >>> +	},
> >>> +	[1] = {
> >>> +		.start	= gic_spi(31),
> >>> +		.flags	= IORESOURCE_IRQ,
> >>> +	},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct rcar_du_platform_data rcar_du_pdata = {
> >>> +	.encoders = {
> >>> +		[0] = {
> >>> +			.encoder = RCAR_DU_ENCODER_VGA,
> >>> +		},
> >>> +	},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >>> +static struct platform_device rcar_du_device = {
> >>> +	.name		= "rcar-du",
> >>> +	.num_resources	= ARRAY_SIZE(rcar_du_resources),
> >>> +	.resource	= rcar_du_resources,
> >>> +	.dev	= {
> >>> +		.platform_data = &rcar_du_pdata,
> >>> +		.coherent_dma_mask = ~0,
> >>> +	},
> >>> +};
> >>> +
> >> 
> >> Are we seeing again SoC device declared in the board file? That simply
> >> doesn't scale...
> > 
> > The goal is obviously to move all that to DT, but there's no DT bindings
> > for the DU DRM driver yet.
> 
> I don't see how it justifies dubious non-DT design. Let me tell/remind you
> about the LTSI-3.4 tree where all this stuff can be backported and which
> doesn't have DT support, AFAIR.

This patch is an example only, I should have marked it as such. If I need to 
push something similar to mainline I will keep your comment in mind and see 
how I can move the platform device to setup-r8a7779.c. Platform data, however, 
need to be provided on a per-board basis.

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux