Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 1/7] drm: Move and add a few utility macros into drm util header

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 7/25/22 2:36 PM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 25.07.2022 11:25, Gwan-gyeong Mun wrote:
It moves overflows_type utility macro into drm util header from i915_utils header. The overflows_type can be used to catch the truncation between data types. And it adds safe_conversion() macro which performs a type conversion
(cast) of an source value into a new variable, checking that the
destination is large enough to hold the source value.
And it adds exact_type and exactly_pgoff_t macro to catch type mis-match
while compiling.

v3: Add is_type_unsigned() macro (Mauro)
     Modify overflows_type() macro to consider signed data types (Mauro)
     Fix the problem that safe_conversion() macro always returns true
v4: Fix kernel-doc markups

Signed-off-by: Gwan-gyeong Mun <gwan-gyeong.mun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy.das@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h |  5 +-
  include/drm/drm_util.h            | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
index c10d68cdc3ca..345e5b2dc1cd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
  #include <linux/types.h>
  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
  #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
+#include <drm/drm_util.h>
  #ifdef CONFIG_X86
  #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
@@ -111,10 +112,6 @@ bool i915_error_injected(void);
  #define range_overflows_end_t(type, start, size, max) \
      range_overflows_end((type)(start), (type)(size), (type)(max))
-/* Note we don't consider signbits :| */
-#define overflows_type(x, T) \
-    (sizeof(x) > sizeof(T) && (x) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T))
-
  #define ptr_mask_bits(ptr, n) ({                    \
      unsigned long __v = (unsigned long)(ptr);            \
      (typeof(ptr))(__v & -BIT(n));                    \
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_util.h b/include/drm/drm_util.h
index 79952d8c4bba..1de9ee5704fa 100644
--- a/include/drm/drm_util.h
+++ b/include/drm/drm_util.h
@@ -62,6 +62,83 @@
   */
  #define for_each_if(condition) if (!(condition)) {} else
+/**
+ * is_type_unsigned - helper for checking data type which is an unsigned data
+ * type or not
+ * @x: The data type to check
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * True if the data type is an unsigned data type, false otherwise.
+ */
+#define is_type_unsigned(x) ((typeof(x))-1 >= (typeof(x))0)
+
+/**
+ * overflows_type - helper for checking the truncation between data types
+ * @x: Source for overflow type comparison
+ * @T: Destination for overflow type comparison
+ *
+ * It compares the values and size of each data type between the first and + * second argument to check whether truncation can occur when assigning the
+ * first argument to the variable of the second argument.
+ * Source and Destination can be used with or without sign bit.
+ * Composite data structures such as union and structure are not considered.
+ * Enum data types are not considered.
+ * Floating point data types are not considered.
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * True if truncation can occur, false otherwise.
+ */
+
+#define overflows_type(x, T) \
+    (is_type_unsigned(x) ? \
+        is_type_unsigned(T) ? \
+            (sizeof(x) > sizeof(T) && (x) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T)) ? 1 : 0 \
+            : (sizeof(x) >= sizeof(T) && (x) >> (BITS_PER_TYPE(T) - 1)) ? 1 : 0 \
+    : is_type_unsigned(T) ? \
+        ((x) < 0) ? 1 : (sizeof(x) > sizeof(T) && (x) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T)) ? 1 : 0 \
+        : (sizeof(x) > sizeof(T)) ? \
+            ((x) < 0) ? (((x) * -1) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T)) ? 1 : 0 \
+                : ((x) >> BITS_PER_TYPE(T)) ? 1 : 0 \
+            : 0)


It became quite big and hard to read. I wonder if we could not just check the effects of the conversion, sth like:
#define overflows_type(x, T) ((T)(x) != (x))

Yes, this macro is a bit difficult to read because it takes into account multiple situations. I left a comment with the relevant details in reply to the previous patch so that you could check the details of the macro.

And the macro you commented is not satisfactory in all use cases where the overflows_type() macro is used. If you refer to the bottom part of the link below, you can check the pseudo code of this macro and test scenarios of the use cases covered by this macro. (It also includes the test code.)
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/492374/?series=104704&rev=3

Br,
G.G.

Regards
Andrzej


+
+/**
+ * exact_type - break compile if source type and destination value's type are
+ * not the same
+ * @T: Source type
+ * @n: Destination value
+ *
+ * It is a helper macro for a poor man's -Wconversion: only allow variables of + * an exact type. It determines whether the source type and destination value's + * type are the same while compiling, and it breaks compile if two types are
+ * not the same
+ */
+#define exact_type(T, n) \
+    BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(n) && !__builtin_types_compatible_p(T, typeof(n)))
+
+/**
+ * exactly_pgoff_t - helper to check if the type of a value is pgoff_t
+ * @n: value to compare pgoff_t type
+ *
+ * It breaks compile if the argument value's type is not pgoff_t type.
+ */
+#define exactly_pgoff_t(n) exact_type(pgoff_t, n)
+
+/**
+ * safe_conversion - perform a type conversion (cast) of an source value into + * a new variable, checking that the destination is large enough to hold the
+ * source value.
+ * @ptr: Destination pointer address
+ * @value: Source value
+ *
+ * Returns:
+ * If the value would overflow the destination, it returns false.
+ */
+#define safe_conversion(ptr, value) ({ \
+    typeof(value) __v = (value); \
+    typeof(ptr) __ptr = (ptr); \
+    overflows_type(__v, *__ptr) ? 0 : ((*__ptr = (typeof(*__ptr))__v), 1); \
+})
+
  /**
   * drm_can_sleep - returns true if currently okay to sleep
   *




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux