Hi,
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 3:45 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 1:39 PM Nícolas F. R. A. Prado
> <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The value read from the "hpd-absent-delay-ms" property in DT was being
> > saved to the wrong variable, overriding the hpd_reliable delay. Fix the
> > typo.
> >
> > Fixes: 5540cf8f3e8d ("drm/panel-edp: Implement generic "edp-panel"s probed by EDID")
> > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > index 152e00eb846f..b3536d8600f4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-edp.c
> > @@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ static int generic_edp_panel_probe(struct device *dev, struct panel_edp *panel)
> > of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "hpd-reliable-delay-ms", &reliable_ms);
> > desc->delay.hpd_reliable = reliable_ms;
> > of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "hpd-absent-delay-ms", &absent_ms);
> > - desc->delay.hpd_reliable = absent_ms;
> > + desc->delay.hpd_absent = absent_ms;
>
> Well that's embarrassing. In the end I never used any of these
> properties for anything shipping since HPD was always hooked up on
> later boards and the only board that needed "hpd_reliable" never ended
> up switching to the generic "edp-panel".
>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I'll apply this right away to drm-misc-fixes.
ef2084a8388b drm/panel-edp: Fix variable typo when saving hpd absent
delay from DT
