On 12/07/2022 16:59, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12/07/2022 17:54, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> On 11/07/2022 00:21, Damien Le Moal wrote: >>> On 7/11/22 04:39, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>>> Damien, Krzysztof, >>>> >>>> I know this particular version has not been posted for all that >>>> long, but this binding is (functionally) unchanged for a few >>>> versions now. Are you happy with this approach Damien? >>>> U-Boot only cares about the compatible & the clocks property, >>>> not the regs etc. >>>> >>>> I (lazily) tested it in U-Boot with the following diff: >>> >>> If both the kernel and u-boot still work as expected with this change, I >>> am OK with it. >> >> It's all yours so Krzysztof :) > > It's too late in the cycle for me to pick it up. If you have alternate > tree to take it through, go ahead with: > > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Otherwise, I'll take it after the merge window of v5.20, so in ~1 month > according to crystal ball. Cool, thanks Krzysztof. I know it is late in the game for v5.20. Part of me is hoping that Palmer can take it with the dts patches, going to bump all the outstanding & reviewed riscv dts patches when I send my PR this weekend. If not, I'll remind you in a month. Thanks, Conor.
