Hi Karolina,
Am 11.07.22 um 14:17 schrieb Karolina Drobnik:
Hi Christian,
On 11.07.2022 11:57, Christian König wrote:
Hi Karolina,
Am 11.07.22 um 11:44 schrieb Karolina Drobnik:
Hi Christian,
I'm sorry for digging this one out so late.
On 06.05.2022 16:10, Christian König wrote:
dma_fence_chain containers cleanup signaled fences automatically, so
filter those out from arrays as well.
v2: fix missing walk over the array
v3: massively simplify the patch and actually update the description.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
b/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
index e7c219da4ed7..a4d342fef8e0 100644
--- a/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
+++ b/include/linux/dma-fence-unwrap.h
@@ -43,9 +43,13 @@ struct dma_fence *dma_fence_unwrap_next(struct
dma_fence_unwrap *cursor);
* Unwrap dma_fence_chain and dma_fence_array containers and deep
dive into all
* potential fences in them. If @head is just a normal fence only
that one is
* returned.
+ *
+ * Note that signalled fences are opportunistically filtered out,
which
+ * means the iteration is potentially over no fence at all.
*/
#define dma_fence_unwrap_for_each(fence, cursor, head) \
for (fence = dma_fence_unwrap_first(head, cursor); fence; \
- fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(cursor))
+ fence = dma_fence_unwrap_next(cursor)) \
+ if (!dma_fence_is_signaled(fence))
#endif
It looks like this particular patch affects merging Sync Fences,
which is reflected by failing IGT test (igt@sw_sync)[1]. The failing
subtests are:
- sync_merge - merging different fences on the same timeline, neither
single nor merged fences are signaled
- sync_merge_same - merging the fence with itself on the same
timeline, the fence didn't signal at all
- sync_multi_timeline_wait - merging different fences on different
timelines; the subtest checks if counting fences of
various states works. Currently, it can only see 2
active fences, 0 signaling (should be 2 active,
1 signaling)
Reverting this commit on the top of drm-tip fixes the issue, but I'm
not sure if it wouldn't impact other places in the code. Please let
me know if I can be of any help.
Thanks for letting me know. Not sure what's going on here, but I can
take a look today if time permits.
The reproduction with IGTs should be quite easy. You'll need to
clone/download the IGT code and follow instructions for Building[1]
the project (make sure you have meson and ninja installed):
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Figt-gpu-tools&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C9a9587aefd2d4ac2d86208da63375cb6%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637931386683611766%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=4WsMutcFJ2HwBqld%2BTv9N1Tx6cbFMwJJZ6kjm5rbfoI%3D&reserved=0
Once you have it up and running, go to <igt path>/build/tests, and run
the subtests:
./sw_sync --run sync_merge
./sw_sync --run sync_merge_same
./sw_sync --run sync_multi_timeline_wait
You can run all the subtests with ./sw_sync, but I think these are the
most relevant to you.
Thanks, I've already managed to reproduce it.
Not sure what's going on here, but could be that the test case was never
correct in the first place. Need to double check.
Thanks,
Christian.
Many thanks,
Karolina
------------------
[1] -
https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fdrm%2Figt-gpu-tools%23building&data=05%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C9a9587aefd2d4ac2d86208da63375cb6%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637931386683611766%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FV0Ao6ra8EOyr4cOs4N7mCmpOEUUObTrgyOrd0tvEV8%3D&reserved=0
Do you have a description how to easy reproduce this? E.g. how to run
just those specific igts?
Thanks,
Christian.
All the best,
Karolina
